AN UNJUST LEGAL SYSTEM GIVES JUDGES IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION

Reference Info on Judicial Immunity. I am not an Attorney. This article does not constitute legal advice. Congress have given Judges rights that are not afforded any other American including The President, Congressmen and Woman, Governors or Ambassadors. Although judges should be able to function without interference from politicians or public interests, they should not be given blank immunity from prosecution. Some of the most unthinkable crimes against common American citizens are being committed by judges. Judges continue to rank among the highest in professional crime offenders per ca pita in America. Yet it is almost impossible to sue a judge.

 Given the knowledge of immunity, judges continue to reap havoc in the lives of vulnerable Americans. The case of Ulrich v. Butler case # 09-7660, was a civil case attempting to hold the Court to limits as defined by Constitutional and Statutory Law. Here is the US Supreme Court decision. Here are the details; fasten your seat belt: In the Eleventh Judicial District of Illinois,

Woodford County, in a civil case, an individual’s civil and constitutional rights were denied as the third judge in the case (first two Judges were recused after review by the Judicial Review Board) did deny multiple requests to have all proceedings recorded, did state that no motions or petitions as filed by the individual would be heard, did illegally incarcerate the individual without regard to Habeas Corpus, did knowingly ignore Illinois state statutes, and not only violated due process of Law, but denied equal protection under the law.

 Failure to obtain substantial Justice in state courts lead to suits being filed in Federal Court under Title 42 United States Code standard 1983.This suit asks for Relief of all orders made in violation of the Law, that Due Process of Law be allowed, and further issue relief as the court deems appropriate. The Federal District Judge in the Case stated that although the Court does not know the details of the case that a Judge performing Judicial Functions enjoys absolute immunity and further stated that a Jury would not be allowed in the case.

The appellate court without allowing a brief supported this order. While a Judge performing Judicial functions may enjoy Immunity, denial of constitutional and civil rights are absolutely not a judicial function and conflicts with any definition of a Judicial function. Response to denials were Motions to reinstate using the Constitutional Articles as a major Guide, along with the Judges Oath of Office, and canons of Judicial Code of Conduct. The responses also included page after page of case law where both appellate courts and the Supreme Court did hold judges accountable when their knowing and willing actions fell outside the boundaries of their job description.

 That failure to follow simple guidelines of their post makes a judge's action no longer a Judicial act but an Individual act as the act represents their own prejudices and goals. Case Law also states that when a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, he then loses subject matter jurisdiction and the Judges orders are void, of no legal force or affect. In a limited government, a government limited by the constitution, the violation of a citizens rights should never be justified due to the overriding government goals or objectives, and that no branch of the government be allowed to extend it's power beyond it's legal limits.

The above issues are one of the outstanding reasons why the framers of the constitution installed Trial by Jury as the Seventh Amendment. In a government of the people is it not a threat to our way of life to allow Government actors to ignore the guidelines that define their power. Also check out Stephen Ulrich's Motions regarding judicial immunity ________________________________________ Read the case of Judge Antonio Almeida who took bribes and refused to cooperate when caught. This case has an excellent brief against absolute judicial immunity and the court's response. Fasten your seatbelt...again. ________________________________________ How To Possibly Sue a Judge Note: this information was submitted by a Constitutional Attorney years ago who since has said this rarely works anymore. One must keep in mind that we are not a country of laws anymore.

 We are a country where laws are creatively interpreted. This means you can go in with all the case law on point A and the court will decide the case on point D, Section 3B. The courts routinely back pedal on deciding cases that go against the status quo, especially in the cases involving judicial immunity. This is not intending to discourage you from seeking relief - just know many times the relief you get will be the embarrassment and publicity you bring to the wrongdoer. If Everyone Did This Every Time They Experienced Legal Misconduct We Would Not Be In This Mess

. Has a judge violated your constitutional rights? Have you been discriminated against by being treated differently than other people in similar situations by reason of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual preference or political opinion? Have you lost certain rights without a meaningful hearing or even an opportunity to be heard? Have you been deprived of any other constitutional protection? Have you been subject to Court action for the purpose of intimidating you from exercising an opinion, or practicing your faith?

 Don't let them get away with it. Although it is almost impossible to recover monetary damages from a judge (unless you can prove he or she acted ultra-vires beyond his or her legal jurisdiction) it is in fact possible to obtain relief in equity against a judge through civil rights actions. Equitable relief includes: • declaratory relief - (rulings by another judge in the form of opinions establishing the constitutionality or lack of constitutionality of another judges actions.) • injunctive relief - a command or order to do something or refrain from doing so.

 As a general rule, however, judges cannot be held liable for money damages for acts done in the exercise of his judicial function, within the limits of his jurisdiction, no matter how erroneous, illegal or malicious his acts may be. (48A Corpus Juris Secundum §86) A minority of decisions have held that if an inferior judge acts maliciously or corruptly he may incur liability. Kalb v. Luce, 291 N.W. 841, 234, WISC 509. Federal Civil Rights statutes, and possibly Bivens actions, appear to offer the best path for redressing constitutional grievances with state and federal judges, respectively, in Federal Court.

As a practical matter, such cases will usually be brought by pro se litigants. Neither the politics nor economics of law practice permits lawyers to pursue such cases nor makes them affordable except to a small elite of citizens. However, lawyers who do successfully sue state judges in federal court in Title 42 U.S. Code § 1983 cases can recover attorney's fees from judicial defendants provided they can show time sheets kept contemporaneously with their work.

 The most important step you have to take in beginning your lawsuit is in writing the complaint that will be conforming to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (available in every Government Bookstore or from the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC.) Properly drafted complaints need not be prepared by a lawyer. All that is required is a very fundamental understanding of a few basic constitutional principles and a typewriter and paper. Handwritten complaints can also be filed in court.

 Each federal court publishes its own local rules which can impose some additional requirements, but essentially there are only a handful of things you need to know. 1. Each complaint has a caption reading "United States District Court, District of (name the jurisdiction e.g. Southern New York or Eastern California.) 2. Each complaint includes a caption indicating the name of the plaintiff, and the name of the defendant. The words "individually and in his official capacity" should appear after the name of the defendant judge.

 The words "Verified Complaint" should appear on the right side of the caption. Your caption should appear like this: United States District Court District of (State) Civil Docket No. _______ John Doe, Plaintiff vs. VERIFIED COMPLAINT Bobby Roe, individually and in his/her official capacity as Justice of the Superior Court ) of [*****] County, Defendant A couple of spaces below, you must begin to spell out your reasons for bringing your complaint to Court. Make an outline of your case. First, state your "Jurisdictional Basis" in Paragraph I. I usually write as follows: JURISDICTIONAL BASIS I. Plaintiff claims federal jurisdiction pursuant to Article III § 2 which extends the jurisdiction to cases arising under the U.S. Constitution.

 Next you should write Paragraph II stating the precise Statutory Authority why you brought the case. If you are suing a state judge, you will state: II. Plaintiff brings this suit pursuant to Title 42 U.S. Code § 1983 for violations of certain protections guaranteed to him by the First, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments (select which apply) of the federal Constitution, by the defendant under color of law in his/her capacity as a judge in the Superior Court of (****) County. If you are suing a federal judge, state: "Plaintiff brings this action against (name), a federal judicial officer, pursuant to Title 28 U.S. Code § 1331, in claims arising from violations of federal constitutional rights guaranteed in the (fill in) amendments to the U.S. Constitution and redress able pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Narcotics Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971)."

 Be aware that the issue of whether federal judicial officers can in fact be sued under this authority is unresolved, but my opinion is that there is a strong implication in the affirmative based on the language in many cases. Your complaint should then have a section entitled "Parties". The next two paragraphs would read: III. Plaintiff (Your name) is a natural person residing at (Your address), (County), (State). IV. Defendant is a Judge presiding at (fill in.) Following this you must now describe your claim in detail, giving legal and factual basis for your case.

 This portion of the case is entitled "Statement of Case" What kind of factual pattern would give rise to a successful claim under the federal civil rights law? Title 42 U.S. Code § 1983 reads as follows: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.

 The burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to show that the defendant judge acted unconstitutionally or outside of his/her jurisdiction. If the judge engaged in an egregious discrimination against males in a divorce court, minorities in state criminal cases, members of an unpopular religious group in confrontation with government authorities and treated suspiciously in court or members of a "fringe" political group, these situations can give rise to a claim of denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

 If a judge permits an ex parte attachment, i.e. seizure of real estate without giving you notice of a hearing in a state court proceeding, this is a deprivation of property without due process, violating the Fifth Amendment as well as the Fourteenth Amendment. Ex parte restraining orders forcing men or women out of their homes based on abuse allegations in state courts are a primary and rampant example of violations of constitutional rights today, and certainly actionable in federal court. The first ten amendments of the Bill of Rights are self explanatory.

Violations of any of the rights described in these amendments give rise to causes of action, both against state judges under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and arguably against federal judges in Bivens actions. Pro se litigants should give a clear and concise description of what happened in chronological order, identifying the judge, the date, time, and place of his or her action, and specifying which acts violated which constitutional amendments.

The complaint finishes with a section entitled "Prayer for Relief." In such a case you can ask for an injunction ordering another judge to so something, or to refrain from doing something. Successful use of these suits has been made to nullify attachments, end incarcerations, declare laws or court practices unconstitutional and scare the heck out of black robed tyrants with gavels. See Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1983). I often phrase my prayers for relief as follows: Wherefore plaintiff prays this Court issue equitable relief as follows: 1. Issue injunctive relief commanding defendant to . . . 2. Issue declaratory relief as this Court deems appropriate just. 3. Issue other relief as this Court deems appropriate and just. 4. Award plaintiff his costs of litigation. Respectfully submitted, (Your signature) Your name printed Your address City, State, Zip Code Telephone No. Statement of

Verification I have read the above complaint and it is correct to the best of my knowledge. Your signature Complaints are filed in the Civil Clerk's Office in the United States District Court for your district. Federal rules now allow for service of process by certified mail. You will be required to serve the defendant judge and also your state attorney general if you are suing a state judge. The pro se road will be easier if you study the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, obtain a Black's Law Dictionary and familiarize yourself with legal research methods.

You must also read the Local Rules of the Federal Court where you are suing, and learn Constitutional law fast. Using a lawyer as a coach is helpful. Bear in mind that your lawsuit is disfavored because it is against a judge. Nevertheless, our system of "justice" is in such tough shape that suits against judges are a socio-political necessity. Complaints should be photocopied, disseminated to the legislature, the media and political action groups. Perhaps the cumulative impact of these suits will bring a healthy radical change for the American people.

Even President Trump is entitled to Civil and Constitutional rights protection and preservation.

Last week represents a dark day in United States Judiciary.The fact that any section of the judiciary or law enforcement can find it lawful to enter an attorney's office and remove information relating to this attorney's client without knowledge of a pending crime or an imminent action that is against laws is very concerning.

 As civil rights advocates, we cannot afford to water down provisions regarding civil and constitutional rights protection and preservation. If we allow institutions to self determine when rights are to be afforded to citizen, we stand the risk of uncertainties relating to laws and procedures for one of the most vital protections afforded Americans by means of the Constitution. Attorney Client privilege protects every day Americans from the threat of relaying private information to their attorneys only for the attorney to be forced or raided in order for law enforcement to obtain the information forcefully.

 The process is no different from a church member confiding in his or her priest or pastor only for law enforcement to compel release of the information.

The right to require an attorney not to disclose confidential communication made to his or her attorney refered to as attorney client relationship has been established in many American courts. See U.S v. United Shoe Mach. Corp, D. Mass., 89 F. Supp.357. Also attorney client privilege cited as Livingston v. Allis_Chalmers Corp., D.C. Miss., 109 F.R.D. 546,550. Fed. Evid.

 Rule 501. Civil Rights advocates and institutions have to safe guard Civil Rights for all Americans, regardless of whether the defense is unpopular or the party is controversial.

Today its President Trump, tomorrow its Jack the painter. We simply cannot allow civil and Constitutional rights to be interfered with by any person, institution or association. Justice denied to anyone represents justice denied to everyone. We have all heard, seen or experienced ill effects of Constitutional and Civil rights violations. We have to be very careful of procedures necessary to stop a runaway train once it has left the station. Jules Williams familyactivist@gmail.com

FAMILIES AND FAMILY COURTS AT WAR.

Jules Williams Birmingham Member ACLU,

I am a proud card member of the ACLU. The ACLU has for many years been a leader in the protection and preservation of Human rights for all Americans. My interest in Civil Rights violation protection is a result of years of experience with Family Court 246 Harris County Texas. Family court 246, in my opinion, is an evil, wicked, and repressive institution that has been practicing punitive, medieval and draconian acts for years against residents of Harris County Texas.

 What is more frightening, it there are institutions and individuals, charged with protecting Constitutional and Civil rights who instead of honoring the Constitution and being respectful of civil rights are ignoring obvious violations by family courts giving cover to rouge, reckless Judges. They simply bury their heads in their desks ignoring the suffering of parents and children at the hands of these judges.

 That any individual, institution, or Judge can remove anyone from their homes, ignoring various Constitutional rights including the 1st, 4th, 5th 7th, and 14th Amendments without hearing, trial or due process cannot be considered by any other term but blatant arrogant disregard for the American Constitution. America would surely criticize and even chastise any country involved in violating the civil rights of their countrymen. Yet family courts including family court 246 Harris County Texas abuse the authority given to them by our judicial system and perform cruel barbaric acts upon law-abiding residents every work day.

We need to guard against violations of rights worldwide. We are obligated to preserve Constitutional and civil rights for all Americans. we are obligated to erase judicial oppression and Constitutional and Civil rights everywhere it exists.

 Family courts are judicial institutions that have to be aware of the weight this country places on due process of law. Judges should not be feared but should be respected for being professionals and adhering to high standards demanded of their profession and expected for the preservation of the American Judaical System.

 Family courts have assumed the role of family oppressors, judicial actors of cruel heartless, and abusive actions. Family courts are surrounded by powerful enablers that provide cover for rouge family court judges. Family court 246 Harris County has evolved into a manual for punitive draconian, medieval acts against residents of Harris County.

Acts such as removing parents from their homes, confiscating their property, annihilating children from their parents, ordering privileged attorneys to acquire bank accounts in foreign countries, and dividing property without trial all without due process of law are inconceivable for novices like myself furthermore for professionals of law at the highest level. Family court 246 Harris county has become a manual for all sorts of cruelty and inhumanity against parents, children, and families. ACLU has been a champion for preserving and defending Civil rights for all Americans. I am delighted to be associated with an institution that represents dignity and humanity for all Americans.

Reviews of Judge Prine and Associate Ramos family court 246 Harris County Texas

Many reviews of Judge Prine exist. Here are a handful based on 15 selected. Judge Prine's Average Overall Review: Associate Judge Ramo Court 246 Harris County Texas. Based on 15 reviews 2553. other This father lied in court under oath and got away with it. He shund the one child for 6 years. He protected one son during IKe and cared less about the other son or his wife. Since the boys have pulled away from her these last weeks I am sure that they have been threaten by there father. They are afraid of him. It is so out of character for them.

 This woman is ignorant of the law. I witnessed 2 attorneys plead before her; one with over 30 years of experience in family law, the other with a loud mouth and circular logic. She has sided with the loud mouth in 2 different hearings. She degrades the family court with every decision. She has no business even being a lawyer mush less an associate judge. She is biased to the point of siding with a worthless drunk over a disabled and mentally abused woman. She deserves to be impeached AND disbarred.

7713. party to case (pro se) I can not believe that judge Charlie Prine does not go by the rules of law. He goes by his own rules and even though you hire experts he goes against the experts. For example me and my ex wife had a mediated settle agreement upon she past a drug test.

Unfortunately she failed due to meth and Charlie said the drug test didn't matter. The expert testified that it was not a false positive... 8497. witness How do we let our voices be heard? This man is completely unfair. It's terrifying how he's playing with the lives of others and can sleep at night. 2552. other Prine is not a fair and just judge.

He does not listen to the whole case He proves that money talks in Texas. He does not approve of same sex relationships ( that case made national news). He is willing to give children to a so called father that never really wanted kids. A man that emotionally abused with a moderate amount physical abuse. This man was given 2/3 of my daughter salary to buy electronic stuff for the kids instead of clothes.

 In the last three months I have had to pay for clothes and hair cuts for the boys and my daughter can do things with the boys to the tune of$1000. Do I want this man in office ? Hell no! My daughter is a bad housekeeper yes! Did she deserve to loose her kids? No. The boys will not even spend time with her because she made them do homework work on the STAAR test. I made the mistake of treating them to the rodeo when completed the sample test. Their so called father does not make them do homework.

They are both failing in school. I actively campaign against Prine. I want justice for all not just the rich. 2573. other I want to actively campaign against this man. He needs to be out of office. It is obvious he would like to see women back in the Victorian era with no rights. What is this country coming to. It is not an American for all but for the rich and it non moralistic lawyers. 4262. other Sadly, this man has moved from Associate Judge of Judge Dean, a corrupt judge, to District Judge of the 246th Court. He has appointed Chelsie Ramos as his associate judge as a political favor.

 She has no experience in family law, and looking at the tro's that she signed, doesn't care to spend any time learning family law. Her sole accomplishment for this job was being married to a former family law associate judge. Now the list has come out of the judges that refuse to appoint attorneys from a generally-accepted list, accepted by all but 4 courts. So 8 courts (9 if you include the CPS court - that the courts didn't need but which was set up so Judge Farr could take credit for it) are ok with the qualifications of the attorney list, and 4 aren't. And those 4 are.....this judge, the judge he worked under, and 2 other dishonorable judges (Alicia Franklin York and Jim Lombardino). These 4 judges continue to thank campaign donors with appointments and high-paid vouchers.

 Did it ever bother anybody that, as an associate judge, this judge took off more time that the judge that appointed him? And that they took off at the same time so, despite that you, the tax payer, paid 2 judges to cover one court, they regularly left that court without a single judge for weeks at a time, and anytime a political event was scheduled? It's past time to stop covering up for the good-old-boy system in Harris County Family Courts. The corruption has been reported since the 1990's, and the only judge any one ran out of the office was the one that rebuked these people. 7859. party to case (pro se) This judge is below any rating.

 I consider both judges of family court 246 pirates. I blog about these judges at https//williamsjules57.blogspot.com and posts at https://plus.google.com under search Jules Williams. I tweet as Jules williams also face book. The judges of court 246 are unfair, unjust, heartless and discriminating judicial representative operating in any court. Family court judges court 246 are a detriment to children and a danger to families

. These judges ignore due process, are comfortable lying and prejudging cases. The trial judge scares litigants in his court using anger and violence. These are two scary judges no one should chance messing with. They can cause an Innocent law abiding citizen to have a really bad day. 8899. party to case (with attorney) what an excellent judge. he saved the kids form abusive alcoholic mother with mental history who lied to get her spouse in jail which the husband easily beat the charges. more of these type of judges are needed with morals. 9014. party to case (with attorney) You'll Please Report Judge Prine and Judge Ramos @ www.scjc.texas.gov (1-877-228-5750) like l did so we can get these corrupted Judges out of our Judicial system.

They both is such a disgrace to our society. 9031. party to case (pro se) Judge prine is not a fair judge, there can be proud of domestic abuse with graphic pictures of the incident, yet not grant a protective order. He's a horrible judge, I thought these reviews were all a lie until I experienced it for myself today. He rolled his eye with every proof of domestic violence I gave in, including a threat to kill me from my ex husband which was stated it directly came from in. Yet he didn't grant it, I shall be back with a attorney to redo this case. 8773. attorney (private practice) He doesn't deserve 1 star.

 Out of the 100 or so judges I've had the pleasure of practicing in front of...he is by far, like really far, the worst. He should be removed from office. 8900. party to case (with attorney) what an excellent judge. he saved the kids form abusive alcoholic mother with mental history who lied to get her spouse in jail which the husband easily beat the charges. more of these type of judges are needed with morals. 9059. party to case (with attorney) To 10/03/17 & 10/05/17.

 You guys are right on the money. Both judges do not understand the family law and are extremely vengeful. I recommend that you send complaints also to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct. Nothing will get done, but eventually they will get enough complaints about this 2 power drunk judges. 9084. party to case (pro se) Judge prine is a very horrible judge, he doesn't go by the law, he makes up his own rules and I feel he really hates women. I've also seen judge Ramos work and she doesn't even care about her job. Both of these judges are corrupted. Judge prine is a woman hater and will always side with the father no matter what. We need these judges out the system.

Parents joy is derived from their children achievements

#airmovement123

Parents' joy is derived from their children's achievements: 

We have to do everything in our power as parents to ensure Government doesn't lay claim to our children, compromising their future and destroying their lives forever. Family courts destroy parents' and children's present and future life forever. Family court decisions are not complicated as many seem to believe. What complicates their decision is their desire to ignore laws and codes in order to arrive at preconceived decisions that conform to their biases. Remember family court decisions are not based on facts of the case, laws, precedence, or even the Constitution. Most decisions are pre-made by judges prior to motions, hearings, or trials. These judges lock onto various matrices geared to accomplish their preconceived objectives. Essentially, it is based on how many matching funds dollars their efforts will account for.

 Family courts conclude using the Constitutionally obvious flawed doctrine of discrimination based on sex, that mothers are for keeping house and fathers are for being home money, which has resulted in family courts awarding sole managing conservatory about 88% in favor of mothers. The result has been the deprivation of necessary exposure needed to be competitive in lucrative areas of education and employment. What is lost with family courts is that their main objective is to pursue decisions that are in the best interest of the child's present and future.

I refer this court to the Texas Family Code Sec. 153.002. BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. The best interest of the child should always be the primary consideration of the court in determining the issues of conservatorship and possession of and access to the child. 

Not an attorney, so this post does not constitute legal advice.

Take advantage of opportunities for our children's education

Judicial assault on families using child support. continues.

 Judicial assault on families using child support continues in America

 

Lawmakers continue their efforts at destroying American families. While national criticism of family law and specifically child support continues nationwide, Congress is again using financial child support to continue imposing further hardships on parents and children. Congress has been responsible for unbelievable family hardships in America for many years. Congress is directly responsible for family destruction, poverty, social evils, and community demise. Congress has destroyed families and is responsible for calamities experienced in American society today.

 Make no mistake, family laws represent criminalizing law-abiding citizens, and extorting financial resources from especially minority families, ensuring minorities remain dependent on political handouts, and social programs. Where politicians don't find tax increases popular with the American population, lawmakers have no problem taxing parents more than 50% of their salaries, many of these parents struggle paycheck to paycheck.

 Child support has always been about money to States and judicial institutions; Studies have shown that child support rarely assists children, and recipients often have bad social habits and other financial circumstances. Congress always seems to ignore the harm caused by their actions, and overwhelming evidence that their involvement in critical areas of American life usually results in tremendous harm, and hardships to so many. The following statements by influential congressmen clearly show disconnect and community-related ignorance associated with their position on child support.

 These congressmen ignore national problems associated with ill-conceived child support policies including parents committing suicide, military active personnel losing their children, judges erasing children-parent relationships, and children placed in dangerous situations because of judges' careless use of family laws. Some of these effects include poverty, lowered self-esteem, and inability to compete in society are evils associated with family laws. Congress always seems to find common themes that the public can associate with, to initiate brainwashing needed to impose financial hardships on American parents, vulnerable to laws that result in them being made criminals, while providing easy money to States, making use of hidden tax increases on unsuspecting parents.

Deadbeat parents provide them the option. Can anyone believe in forcefully taking money from one parent to give to State programs, that claim to provide support to children disguised as tax parents? Having a child grow with the knowledge that their lives have been financed using food stamps, Government insurance, free school meals, and child support forcefully taken from an otherwise caring and loving parent is in the best interest of the child. An analysis of statements from three congressmen below clearly shows ignorance and out-of-touch conclusions by key members of America's congress, responsible for laws that Americans are to be governed by.

 There is no emphasis on parents spending time with their children, these children are used by family courts to punish parents disadvantaged by American family laws. If these congressmen were sincere, they would pay attention to the best interest of children, including all aspects beneficial to them, and not the financial component that they can enforce, using threats of imprisonment. In announcing the legislation Congressman Boustany said, “This president thinks he can use his pen and phone to make sweeping policy changes without legislation, but it is Congress’ role to determine child support policy, not the administration’s.

 The president’s rule could potentially let delinquent parents off the hook when we should be focused on structuring these important programs to promote strong families.” Senator Hatch said, “This legislation is necessary to reaffirm Congress’ role in legislating social welfare policy …Last year the administration issued a proposed rule that, if made final in its current form, would make it easier for non-custodial parents to evade paying child support—a move that could potentially force some American families to go on welfare. Deadbeat parents, not hardworking taxpayers, should be held accountable for their financial responsibilities.

 Our bill will prevent the administration from going forward with a unilateral approach that bypasses Congress yet again and undermines this key feature of welfare policy.” Senator Cornyn echoed those comments by saying “While Attorney General of Texas, I fought to hold deadbeat parents responsible for paying the financial support their children deserve, and I am troubled to see President Obama go around Congress to undermine a similar effort. This bill will stop the president’s unilateral action and ensure our child support laws protect innocent children and taxpayers, not absentee parents.” Speaker Ryan had one of the most sensible, reasonable, and appropriate approaches to family law reform and especially regarding child support.

 What creates the need for financial child support? The speaker of the House flirted with providing aid necessary to address the needs for supporting the child. His approach is outside the thinking of most politicians. However, the idea that parents' needs should be evaluated, and support be given to address the needs of children makes sense. For example, a parent with control of children is unable to receive financial assistance from the other parent, who can provide some level of assistance and has a job but has transportation problems.

The need is transportation, and an able parent should provide that assistance to enable continued support of the child. If housing is the problem, aid from the capable parent, found unsuitable for continuous parenting should provide child support to the abled parent to meet that need. Lawmakers should address the best interest of children while not leaving parents no option other than to end their own lives, many times taking their children in the process, CPS ravages families, and family court judges erasing family structures while destroying communities and cultures in the process. Lawmakers must be held responsible for the actions they take that result in death to parents, injury, and harm to our children, including scars some irreparable that they must live with past 18 years, some for the remainder of their lives.

 The need exists for a medium that identifies this tragedy to the lawmakers that enabled them, available for anyone to find. Such a medium will remove hiding places for politicians who find comfort in making perilous decisions than simply walking away and living lives undisturbed by the calamities they have created. 

Familyactivist@gmail.com