Can family courts be using judical michief as a tool to inconvience minority males.

Family court 246 has had motions filed by a minority male from June 25th 2016, and has been scheduling hearings from 30th June to this date while finding one reason or another not to conduct the hearings. A motion to modify an order from June 25th is pending, yet the judge decision to impose child support and primary custody has been in effect. The courts flirt with a band aid has not materialize and so it continues to impose its will without due process. After all the court decision was based on a default judgment vigorously contested.

Like pirates the court seem not to act consistent with the requirements of the American constitution regarding due process. How can court 246 remove an owner of a house where he resides for 14 years ignoring due process. More over the decision was made by an Associate judge who seem to have the power to confiscate a home and give to some one who abandoned the two years ago, without any provision for expenses.

 We are not dealing as pirates here. We are dealing with an Associate judge that is using the tool of judicial mischief. This associate judge simply demands turning a key to a house to some one who has an apartment with no directive for paying bills associated with the house.

 Off course she has been in the house for almost 3 months without paying any mortgage while the court continues to delay hearings and final divorce. During that time debts continue to be accrued, family court is helping children by making possible the lost of their home.

What have children especially minorities done to deserve the wrath of family court, that makes it possible for them to loose their home of so many years. Every American should be concerned with the power given to an Associate Judges. Judges were considered Honorable for many years. Some cultures considered them Lords and refer to them as Lord ships.

 Can any one outside Judges and their affiliates tell of character that these Judges can claim give credence to associate them with terms such as Honor and Lord ship? Unlikely. Family court judges use relentless fear, bully, intimation and judicial mischief to impose unfair decisions and perpetuate lynching on minorities especially male parents. State law makers have the obligation to review actions of family courts and protect especially minorities from the wrath of these judges that results in violations of their civil and human rights a requirement of the 14th amendment.

Why is family court delaying hearing temporary order hearings indefinitely?

Family courts in Houston Texas schedule hearings for order to modify but never conduct these hearings. Many  involve child support and residency.
Could it be the court have a motive  for not conducting these hearings?

In one instance the court upheld a complaint from the Attorney General Office that paper work was too cumbersome if the judge decided to modify the order. 

Are minorities especially minority male fathers paying child support for longer periods because judges simply prolong  final divorce trials , that keep their temporary child support in place.

Family court reform is urgently need in order to preserve civil and human rights of especially minority males. Courts seem to take advantage of that group supported by the Attorney General Office.

Mothers are for keeping House Fathers are for bringing home the money.

Family courts, and in particular court 246 Houston seem to retain remnants of the theory mothers are for keeping house while fathers are for bringing home money. Enshrined in this belief, is family court has to frame court decisions to ensure at the conclusion of a divorce trial, that is not settled through mediation, that mother gets primary residence and temporary custody of the children and eventual child support.

That fathers are parents and should be considered equally in family issues does not seem to be a reality that family courts are likely to acknowledge. In minority circumstances, the court seem to pave the way for the mothers to have primary residence and child custody during the hearing stages when temporary orders are decided.

 And if for any reason the male component of the case had the children and primary residence and he misses a hearing for any reason, the court exploits the situation, grants primary residence and custody to the mother and simply have the Attorney General tack on the final nail in the coffin, child support. These judgments may be bias, manipulated, misguided and not in the interest of children involved.

That fathers are parents too is widely ignored by family courts and consequently lead to decisions from the court that are bias, one sided and not in the interest of any one involved. Family courts have not evolved to the stage where  they believe parents provide equal opportunities for the care and well being of the child.

 Family court remove components from the parent  that is not of their choosing  to be the primary parent  of their choosing  making it difficult for the disadvantaged parent at the final phase of the divorce. Their decisions have not only disadvantaged the other parent they have compromised any effort at successful mediation and consequently any chance of achieving an economical conclusion at the time of final divorce.

 Family courts have to evaluate the parent who is able to provide the best interest of the child in its totality. If children have been living with their father their entire lives, but due to a  legal technicality the father was removed from the home as a temporary measure, the court should not use that decision as a default to award custody, primary residence and child support to the mother.

 I am calling on law makers to review cases where either parent  has had  changes  to residence and custody  and ends up by default  losing  primary residence, custody and child support at final judgment.

Mothers are for keeping House Fathers are for bringing home the money.

Family courts, and in particular court 246 Houston seen to retain remnants of the theory mothers are for keeping house while fathers are for bringing home the money. Enshrined in this belief, is family court has to frame court decisions to ensure at the conclusion of a divorce trial, that is not settled through mediation, the mother gets primary residence and temporary custody of the children and eventual child support.

That fathers are parents and should be considered equally in family issues does not seem to be a reality that family courts are likely to acknowledge. In minority circumstances, the court seem to pave the way for the mothers to have primary residence and child custody during the hearing stages when temporary orders are decided. And if for any reason the male component of the case had the children and primary residence and he misses a hearing for any reason, the court exploits the situation, grants primary residence and custody to the mother and simply have the Attorney General tack on the final nail in the coffin, child support.

That fathers are parents too is widely ignored by family courts and consequently lead to decisions from the court that are bias, one sided and not in the interest of any one involved. Family courts have not evolved to the stage where parents provide equal opportunities for the care and well being of the child. Family court remove components from the parent they choose as to be the primary parent for the child making it difficult for the disadvantaged parent at the mediation phase of the divorce. Their decisions have not only disadvantaged the other parent they have compromised any effort at successful mediation and consequently any chance achieving an economical conclusion at the time of final divorce. Family courts have to evaluate the parent who is best able to provide the best interest of the child in its totality. If children have been with their father for their entire lives, and due to legal technicality the father was removed from the home as a temporary measure, the court should not use that decision as a default to award custody, primary residence and child support to the mother. I am calling on law makers to review cases where either parent that received changes as to residence and custody ends up by default with these judgments as final judgment.

FAMILY COURT ? OR FAMILY CUT?

The last place one would expect deceitful practices that are obviously questionable is in the Judicial system of America. America boost of the most open and just legal system in the world. Many of us don't believe American legal system is fair or equal. The court to many is deceitful in its practice and disadvantages children and parents and also burdens society with decisions that divide parent from children without liability and consequence.

 Family court exerts too much power especially on vulnerable minority communities. We do not condone pirate like practices, but that is exactly the format used by family court to forcefully take property from families who do not meet their ideals for being primary parent in divorce cases. Pirates take property from others without consent, negotiation or process. They simply take what ever they deem worth taking in order to bully parents into accepting their ideals.

Court 246 consists of two judges who are prepared to do what ever they see fit to bring which ever parent that do not follow their wishes to their knees. One parent who clearly cannot live with another files for divorce in family courts. At the time his life has abandoned the house, the children lives with the father who has to call the police several times to prevent the mother from breaking the house. She had broken glass windows, destroyed electronic door locks, vehicles, mail box and cause physical harm to family members. She attacks visitors using power tools and removes food items from the residence in spite of a restraining order.

This family has been with court 246 for many months, and the court did provide joint parenting between the parents and primary residents to the father. But as the final date for the divorce approached, the court seemingly was prepare to do all in its power to return to its ideal that mothers are for home and fathers are for finance.

 Like pirates they sought to provide the mother with the house and primary custody of the children. Their last objective was to work with the Attorney General Office to impose child support. Like pirates the spoil almost never meets the desired purpose and so often the loot has to be buried never to be useful to anyone. The same is true for court imposed child support. Children rarely benefit from financial support dut to the complexity of life requiring so much more than financial support.

Children needs are vast and simply cannot be paid for using court imposed child support. Courts do not seem to understand that minorities are most likely to be in court to solve family issues and finance is not readily available. That they would impose an instant tax of 25% on any one parent cannot be in the best interest of the child.

More over the court makes these rulings while in the process of determining the conclusion of a divorce. It is clear family courts frame the ideals for influencing these cases by making decisions that favors one parent or another. Decisions that seem unfair and one sided.

Minority children are already disadvantaged and need all the support they can give. Family courts are expected to make decisions that would benefit children in their care and don't burden any parent to parents hindering them from fully supporting their children.

 When a parent home is taken and he is taxed 25%, how is he able to support other activities of benefit to the child. The court expects the parent to make up additional support because of the children. Many court judges have children of their own. Court 246 has a male and female judge. Although not minorities they may have children or family members.

The test question for judges to answer is have I done to this parent what I would like some one to do to my family or myself? And in the case of the Associate judge 246 Houston, turning a 10 year old who have lived with her father all her life to CPS who clearly has no authority for children who are not abandoned or neglected, or a mother the court knows has virtually abandoned her children for the better part of two years cannot be what she would wish for her family.

 Americans need law makers for provide protection for Citizens against oppression especially from Government. Minorities are especially vulnerable to the oppressive actions of institutions of power and resources like family court and Attorney General offices. Without protection Family court with continue its destruction on vulnerable families.

FAMILY COURTS EXHIBITS PIRATE LIKE BEHAVIOR.

The last place one would expect deceitful practices that are obviously questionable is in the Judicial system of America. America boost of the most open and just legal system in the world. Many of us don't believe American legal system is fair or equal. The court to many is deceitful in its practice and disadvantages children and parents and also burdens society with decisions that divide parent from children without liability and consequence.

 Family court exerts too much power especially on vulnerable minority communities. We do not condone pirate like practices, but that is exactly the format used by family court to forcefully take property from families who do not meet their ideals for being primary parent in divorce cases. Pirates take property from others without consent, negotiation or process. They simply take what ever they deem worth taking in order to bully parents into accepting their ideals.

Court 246 consists of two judges who are prepared to do what ever they see fit to bring which ever parent that does not follow their wishes to their knees. One parent who clearly cannot live with another files for divorce in family courts. At the time his life has abandoned the house, the children lives with the father who has to call the police several times to prevent the mother from breaking the house. She had broken glass windows, destroyed electronic door locks, vehicles, mail box and cause physical harm to family members. She attacks visitors using power tools and removes food items from the residence in spite of a restraining order.

This family has been with court 246 for many months, and the court did provide joint parenting between the parents and primary residents to the father. But as the final date for the divorce approached, the court seemingly was prepare to do all in its power to return to its ideal that mothers are for home and fathers are for finance.

 Like pirates they sought to provide the mother with the house and primary custody of the children. Their last objective was to work with the Attorney General Office to impose child support. Like pirates the spoil almost never meets the desired purpose and so often the loot has to be buried never to be useful to anyone.

 The same is true for court imposed child support. Children rarely benefit from financial support due to the complexity of life requiring so much more than financial support.

Children needs are vast and simply cannot be paid for using court imposed child support. Courts do not seem to understand that minorities are most likely to be in court to solve family issues and finance is not readily available. That they would impose an instant tax of 25% on any one parent cannot be in the best interest of the child.

 More over the court makes these rulings while in the process of determining the conclusion of a divorce. It is clear family courts frame the ideals for influencing these cases by making decisions that favors one parent or another. Decisions that seem unfair and one sided.

Minority children are already disadvantaged and need all the support they can give. Family courts are expected to make decisions that would benefit children in their care and don't burden any parent to parents hindering them from fully supporting their children. When a parent home is taken and he is taxed 25%, how is he able to support other activities of benefit to the child.

The court expects the parent to make up additional support because of the children. Many court judges have children of their own. Court 246 has a male and female judge. Although not minorities they may have children or family members. The test question for judges to answer is have I done to this parent what I would like some one to do to my family or myself?

 And in the case of the Associate judge 246 Houston, turning a 10 year old who have lived with her father all her life to CPS who clearly has no authority for children who are not abandoned or neglected, or a mother the court knows has virtually abandoned her children for the better part of two years cannot be what she would wish for her family.

 Americans need law makers for provide protection for Citizens against oppression especially from Government. Minorities are especially vulnerable to the oppressive actions of institutions of power and resources like family court and Attorney General offices. Without protection Family court with continue its destruction on vulnerable families.

COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT FAMILY COURT 246 HOUSTON DID FIX A CASE MONTHS PRIOR TO FINAL?

The last place one would expect deceitful practices that are obviously questionable is in the Judicial system of America. America boost of the most open and just legal system in the world. Many of us don't believe American legal system is fair or equal. The court, to many is deceitful in its practices  and disadvantages children and parents and also burdens society with decisions that divide parent from children without liability and consequence.

 Family court exerts too much power especially on vulnerable minority families. We do not condone pirate like practices, but that is exactly the format used by family court to forcefully take property from parents who do not meet their ideals for being primary parent in divorce cases. Pirates take property from others without consent, negotiation or process. They simply take what ever they deem worth taking in order to enrich themselves. Family courts forcefully confiscate property to effect their ideals.

Court 246 consists of two judges who are prepared to do what ever they see fit to bring which ever parent that does not follow their wishes to their knees. One parent who clearly cannot live with another files for divorce in family courts. At the time the wife abandoned the house, leaving the children with the father who has to call the police several times to prevent the mother from damaging the house. She broke glass windows, destroyed electronic door locks, vehicles, mail box and cause physical harm to family members. She attack visitors using power tools and remove food items from the residence in spite of a restraining order.

This family has been with court 246 for many months, and the court did provide joint parenting between the parents and primary residents to the father. But as the final date for the divorce approached, the court seemingly was prepare to do all in its power to return to its ideal that mothers are for home and fathers are for finance.

 Like pirates they sought to provide the mother with the house and primary custody of the children. Their last objective was to work with the Attorney General Office to impose child support in favor of the mother. Like pirates the spoil almost never meets the desired purpose and so often the loot has to be buried never to be useful to anyone.

 The same is true for court imposed child support. Children rarely benefit from financial support due to the complexity of life that require so much more than financial support.

Children needs are vast and simply cannot be paid for using court imposed child support. Courts do not seem to understand that minorities are most likely to be in court to solve family issues and finance is not readily available. That they would impose an instant tax of 25% on any one parent cannot be in the best interest of the child.

 More over the court makes these rulings while in the process of determining the conclusion of a divorce. It is clear family courts frame the ideals for influencing these cases by making decisions that favors one parent or another. Decisions that are unfair and one sided.

Minority children are already disadvantaged and need all the support they can give. Family courts are expected to make decisions that would benefit  and aid  and minimize burdens to their parents that would hinder them from fully supporting their children.

 When a parent home is taken and he is taxed 25% of his salary how is he able to support other activities of benefit to his child. The court expects the parent to make up additional support because of their affection for their children. Many court judges have children of their own.

 Court 246 has a male and female judge. Although not minorities they may have children or family members. The test question for judges to answer is have I done to this family what I would like some one to do to my mine or myself?

And in the case of the Associate judge from court 246 Houston, turning a 10 year old who have lived with her father all her big life to CPS, who clearly has no authority for children who are not abandoned or neglected,  and to a mother the court knows has virtually abandoned her children for the better part of two years cannot be what she would wish for her family.

 Americans need law makers for provide protection for Citizens against oppression especially from Government. Minorities are especially vulnerable to the oppressive actions of institutions of power and resources like family court and Attorney General offices. Without protection Family court will continue its destruction of .vulnerable families.

Is it possible that family court just dont care about these incredible kids?

Children are the most precious inhabitants of this world. No single component of life brings hope, delight, enjoyment and a reason to fight the battles of life as children do. When Government institutions invade their lives with policies intended to provide help, but complicates their lives, they leave a void in the lives of both parent and child, that is difficult to fill. Government entrust the welfare of children to family courts. These courts reason finance as the only means for caring for children, and encourage hand out and social services as a means of supplementing their efforts.

What family court perceive as necessary for the care and support of children is totally different from what is actually needed. One judge in court 246 Harris County Texas reasoned that turning a 10 year old over to CPS was in the best interest of the child. Lucky for the child CPS knew what their role was limited to abuse and neglect.

 Children will get help because of their attraction to so many in our communities. The greatest hazard children face today is out side decisions that affect their lives made by institutions like family courts.

 One standard that could benefit family court is to ask themselves,( am I doing for this child what I would like someone to do to mine?). Such a question would discourage many of the ill fated decisions family court makes every day.

Parents live to experience the small things their children do, their baby steps, their modes, their learning growth and their natural evolution.

Family courts see children as tools to impose their will upon vulnerable families in need of help. They bully their decisions to parents with the aim of dividing the child, from the parent that does not meet their ideals.

If we allow family courts to degrade parent child relationship we will forever lose the component of life we treasure most. Family court can imagine a world of children void of parents, replaced by care givers.

 Unless family court judges view all children equal and realize children are a parent prize, they will continue to destroy children with the deceptive view of helping them.

When family courts fail who repairs the mess they leave behind? Maybe we will ask court 246 Houston Texas.

There is no question the intended purpose of family court is not that envisage when created. The court intent of protecting children has failed miserably. Family court is entrusted with tremendous power and authority. When  human diversity in behavior is factored, the court becomes a lethal institution hostile to many especially minorities.

The court  takes responsibility for a number of issues dealing with families. Many of these issues are not necessarily of primary concern to courts although very important to parents. Family priorities for  children are  cultured for long term while family court dealings is short relative to that of families.

One would think that family courts would look at children in their  entirety providing  or  helping to provide a structure that meets the basic needs for the child. Far from  that observation being true is the relentless efforts on the part of  ideological and advocate judges that  impose their will and thought priorities to influence the out come of cases involving vulnerable children.

Family court processes are abstract, divisive and devastating . Certainly not that envisage when the court was founded. Family court uses many tools that are used often with devastating consequences. Tools such as confiscation of property, child custody and child support without any process or hearing. Children who lived with one parent for years, could be taken away and given to a pendant who is not necessarily in the child's life or has not been for long periods of time.

Another area  of failure of the court is its affiliation with the  the Attorney Generals Office to award child support. Tools that involve finance are highly suspect to misuse. When family court joins with an institution like the Attorney General office with the task of generating money, bad things are going to happen. The concern is strengthened when  either there is a bias towards one ethnic component, group,  or when economics come into play. Family court becomes a medium for facilitating the more fortunate  or those pre perceived by judges who control these courts.

Family courts have maintained their judgment that mothers are to care for homes including children and father's are to provide finance. This theory has caused tremendous harm to parents and children alike. Family courts find no problem with forcing a father into bankruptcy or simply making him homeless to support their stance for family responsibility.

That family court has failed it's intended purpose,  is an under statement. The ill effects of actions by family court is worse than that of drug abuse and addiction experienced by so many communities. Irresponsible actions by family court judges have led to homelessness, bankruptcy, prison and suicide to name a few.

America has been crying for relief from family courts for many years, but their tears are missed and ignored by those responsible for providing protection from Government institutions under their control. It is my pray that family courts will  be reformed and returned to its desired purpose where children will receive care and priorities necessary for coping with trials destined to occupy so much of their future lives.

Does family court visitation schedule help either parent or child?

Family court schedules for visitation are complicated and are not designed to help either the parent or the child, but to exert the power of an institution that cares very little as to the objective of its actions. The court exhibits little interest in maintaining the relationship that is exists at the time of their involvement, but rather bully vulnerable children into accepting visiting schedules by the parent of their choosing, and primary parent chosen solely by the judge. Parent child relationship have to begin early in life;

 Many believe this relationship begins before birth. Family court judges do not care about disruptions associated with their actions of separation and how for even limited periods, affect the parent child relationship.

There are times when separation from parent or parents is in the best interest of the child, but that decision cannot be made in a vacuum. One would assume that family court judges operate with a plan that primarily focuses on maintaining parent child relationship close to what was normal for the child as possible.

 Effects of separation are not of concern to family courts. The objective of these courts seem to be fixing the child, yet there actions more often than not destroy either one or both parents. Family courts seem to perceive no harm separating a child that has spent years with one parent, and turning that child to a parent that has misses most of that child's life.

Parents have very different views of their children compared to legal authorities. These authorities have a job to do and there is little diversion from their intended vision. Maintaining a child's relationship with a parent is not an objective of family courts.

Research has shown that parent child relationship is essential to the correct up bringing of a child. Stability and consistency cannot be attributes to the term separate. It is my view that judges should not be given authority to perform such sensitive tasks without the benefit of professionals trained in social affairs.

 It may be found that separation from either parent is not an option. Judges do not possess the qualifications to make life changing decisions like awarding one parent a child verses another. The 14th amendment is correct.

The protection it affords should not be diverted from under any circumstance. Courts should provide due process when making decisions that have implications on civil and human rights. Little good can be achieved interpreting such obvious texts. Judges cannot find excuses to separate long term parent fro their children, that would be in the best interest if there was due process. Communities at large has to accept judicial institutions as fair, before separating children from parents can be accepted. With so much contention regarding family courts in America today, communities accepting such decisions maybe well into the future.

 Maintaining continuity for a child should be included as a major priority when separation from parents and awarding custody of a child is to be effected, no effort should be spared in accomplishing that requirement. With the lives of so many children affected by family court judges, the time has come for law makers to make a concerted effort at ensuring checks and balances that would protect children from separation initiated by family court judged and other judicial institutions.

Family court 246 Evil, Ignorance or Mischief

I get the question every day; why Minority causes and why family verses criminal courts? The answer is simple. There is virtually no one living in America who can claim minority status that has not been affected or is being affected one way or another by an institution or organization sanctioned by United States Government. Many of these organizations / Institutions are responsible for day to day operations that involve minority life; yet they provide very little to positively enhance neither the present or future life out come for minorities.

A  problem with Family court is that  its very method of operation either denies or limits stability and competitive resources required by the very subjects they aim to help to enter life stages as either equal or in an advantaged position. Simply put family court operates by imposing fear and intimidation on the persons that  have the responsibility to manage the children caught in the intitutions they are in charge of.

The number one weapon used by family courts, ably supported by the Attorney General's office is financial child support. As we all know, minorities are able to sustain their way of life in spite of enormous pressures with creative and sacrificial methods that in many cases ably provide for their families, When for instance Family Court 246 Houston over night decides to remove a father from his home, replace custody of his children that lived with him for 16 and 10 years then charge him a 25% gross salary tax, they know what the consequences are going to be to this parent. family court does not leave targeted minorities to fate they engineer their demise deliberately and systematically. Keep in mind this father was able to support his family without problems and outside assistance, yet now that their decision is to radically change the structure of that home ill effects of their tools of operation have to be brought into play resulting in great hard ships for parent and children alike. By their actions, the court has separated a working parent from children, canceled a child gym classes, medical therapy, denied a child of new school supplies and uniform, separated a child from her father and place her with a mother that has a 20 year history of abandoning her children. There is no family minority or otherwise that would be charged 25% of gross salary without feeling the effects. None of the judges in family court would take easy a tax of 25% from their salary and the same is true of Attorneys from the District Attorney office, that so easily accommodate the troconian ruling of these judges.

Our dreams and aspirations for our children are the same as Family court judges; yet their operations and reasoning can be so far fetch that they leaves one to conclude they are at war with minority families. The courts concept of fixing the child by destroying the family is one that should be reviewed by law makers. Violation of civil and human rights is so common in family court decisions that it forms the main stay for a large percentage of their decisions. Violation of the 1st and 14 ammendments is so rampant that it has to be these violations are unnoticed because they, by and large affect minorities with limited resources. Oppressive, bias, one sided indifferent rulings by family court judges do not necessarily harm targeted parent as much as it harms the children involved. Parents do harm children during disputes that involve separation and divorce, yet it is family court involvement that drives the final nail in the coffin of all involved. Family court need oversight and their critical decisions need to be reviewed by an independent source. It might be time to have an instant hearing prior to replacing ownership of a residence before a final court decision. For a court to rule it is replacing ownership of a residence, replacing custody and charging 25% tax to a parent and his decision cannot be appealed until a final judgement is ridiculous and destructive.

Shylock the money lender. In the story of Shylock this money lender wanted to be repaid from the man indebted to him. The man unable to pay begged of Shylock to modify the payment plan but Shylock refused. In court the Judge recognized Shylock claim as being lawful. Unlike family court this court decided to abide by the law, requiring the man to render to Shylock a pound of flesh. Remarkable is their ruling that the judgment was one pound of flesh no more no less. After all that agreement was legal in that case. Off course Shylock knew he could not meet the requirement of the judgment precisely one pound of flesh and so he had to cut his loses. Family court knows the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection and protection of property and liberty. Nonsense says Family court Judges. The constitution was not written for Family court since the court makes decisions based on what it seem fit as determined by the concepts and desires of the individual judge. The extreme money lender Shylock trusted the court decision as being fair and just. Can minority males feel the same way with regards to family courts Houston Texas? Court 246 will take your home while you are at work, prevent you from securing your personnel effects, take away your children and charge you child support for the children you have been supporting all their lives. How I wish my dealing was with Shylock verses family court judges 246 Houston. Family court judges place their hands on a Bible and swear to up hold the Constitution of the United States of America, yet there is no doubt they violate consistently the civil and human rights of so many minority Americans each day. What is worse is their action is so apparent to so many in authority who simply turn their heads away, ignoring the pain and suffering their FAMILY CUTS are causing minority parents. America has to make the choice; live by the constitution or continue the genocide of minorities. There can be no reason for family courts ignoring the constitution and reaping such barbaric havoc on minority parents. That law makers are able to live with such abstract decisions makes one wonder if America has any room for minorities or is America simply tolerating minorities for uses incidental to their classification. We need minority chemists, Engineers, Doctors, Politicians, Police, Lawyers, Garbage collectors, Teachers, nurses, trades and culture to name a few. One thing is certain; family courts are involved with hundreds of minority cases each week. It is near impossible to find a decision coming from family court that makes the child situation better at the conclusion of the case compared to the beginning.

Family court judges 246 use fear and deception to oppress especially minority males

 Some courts seem to thrive on the apparent fear experienced by participants of their court, whether citizens, witnesses or attorneys. Yet it should be clear that justice and fear are inversely proportional. Historically regarding fear, the outcome has never resulted in good for the proprietor of the fear.

 Family court 246 uses fear that is knowingly real to participants. Stories of excessive and manipulated child support, disrespect for court participants, incredible purposeful waste of participants time, threat of loss of custody and residence are tools at the disposal of family court judges. Imagine a parent filing a case hoping to bring to an end tremendous  happiness but family court judges through normal business operation deprive you of your home, children, job and way of life all in the name of justice better known a judicial lynching.

 These judges know that time and resources are on their side and all they have to do is degrade your ability to oppose them. They know that challenging them is going to be lengthy and costly they will never be held accountable. Family court evil destruction of especially minority males is well documented but without a national out cry, judges know nothing of substance will be done. Although knowledge of judicial misconduct is wildly known, judges know justice will never be obtained through the system that presently exist in America and minorities do not have what it takes to effect change.

 Minorities have experience institutional oppression from the existence of America. This am sure has contributed to social intolerance that exists today. Fear has never successfully resolve any adverse situation. It is ignorance of family court judges to believe that they will overwhelm minorities with fear to submission.

 Eventually some extent of justice will be provided that will ease even a tiny bit of minority suffering from the hands of family court judges. These judges will in some way face their crimes with the knowledge that these crimes against minorities were conducted deliberately and systematically with the intent of bringing about the demise of a vulnerable people.