Friday, September 16, 2016

Can family courts be using judical michief as a tool to inconvience minority males.

Family court 246 has had motions filed by a minority male from June 25th 2016, and has been scheduling hearings from 30th June to this date while finding one reason or another not to conduct the hearings. A motion to modify an order from June 25th is pending, yet the judge decision to impose child support and primary custody has been in effect. The courts flirt with a band aid has not materialize and so it continues to impose its will without due process. After all the court decision was based on a default judgment vigorously contested.

Like pirates the court seem not to act consistent with the requirements of the American constitution regarding due process. How can court 246 remove an owner of a house where he resides for 14 years ignoring due process. More over the decision was made by an Associate judge who seem to have the power to confiscate a home and give to some one who abandoned the two years ago, without any provision for expenses.

 We are not dealing as pirates here. We are dealing with an Associate judge that is using the tool of judicial mischief. This associate judge simply demands turning a key to a house to some one who has an apartment with no directive for paying bills associated with the house.

 Off course she has been in the house for almost 3 months without paying any mortgage while the court continues to delay hearings and final divorce. During that time debts continue to be accrued, family court is helping children by making possible the lost of their home.
What have children especially minorities done to deserve the wrath of family court, that makes it possible for them to loose their home of so many years. Every American should be concerned with the power given to an Associate Judges. Judges were considered Honorable for many years. Some cultures considered them Lords and refer to them as Lord ships.

 Can any one outside Judges and their affiliates tell of character that these Judges can claim give credence to associate them with terms such as Honor and Lord ship? Unlikely. Family court judges use relentless fear, bully, intimation and judicial mischief to impose unfair decisions and perpetuate lynching on minorities especially male parents. State law makers have the obligation to review actions of family courts and protect especially minorities from the wrath of these judges that results in violations of their civil and human rights a requirement of the 14th amendment.

No comments:

Post a Comment