Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Children are abused in many form unnecessarily by family courts. Many situations involving separation and or divorce may have existed for months or years and resolutions to many issues would have been established. Family court would usually be seen as a means of legitimizing decisions already in place.
Guaranteed to initiate a situation ridden with procedures that all but ensure suffering and misery to children and parents ensuring confusion and enmity between parents and all sorts of negative consequences for children.
Family court 246 Houston Texas is staffed by two judges male and female. One would think the combination would bring about balance decisions favorable to children. Not so. Rulings from the court seem to depict clear disparities favorable to mothers at a ratio 80 to 20% against fathers. In real life, situations of research dealing with similar matrix hoping to achieve equity with such disparity would by very alarming necessitating systematic review.
What is damning is that judges seem to care less about obvious abuse to children caused by their indifference to humanity, careless disregard for laws and knowledge that law makers and citizens have accepted latitude given to them.
Laws, statutes, higher court opinions, codes and American Constitution should be sufficient assets for judges to use without the national brain wash provided to judges to determine disputes involving families.
Giving judges wide latitude to determine family issues, armed with lawyers, social services and the almighty attorney general office against a vulnerable minority parent unable to afford legal representation is like demanding a one leg man run up hill chased by a pack of hungry dogs with a referee given the responsibility to determine the duration of the race. Clearly no latitude is needed in this scenario.
Cases should be decided on merit, without any unnecessary advantage to any party. The coins should be allowed to fall where they may, which is not the case with family cases.
One mother told me court 246 took the side of a felon and advocated and ruled against her in a custody case. I know of a case where a mother abandoned two children for more than two years. Approaching conclusion of the divorce case, the judges took turns getting rid of the father from his home of 15 years and returning the abandoning mother to the house and the children.
In Child Maltreatment 2015 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau) it was reported that in FFY 2015 in the fifty states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, an estimated 683,000 children were victims of child abuse or neglect; and 1,670 children died as a result of abuse or neglect.
The majority of child abuse cases stemmed from situations and conditions that can be preventable when community programs and systems are engaged and supportive. A community that cares about early childhood development, parental support, and maternal mental health, for instance, is more likely to foster nurturing families and healthy children.
A Network for Action 2017 Resource Guide, also developed by the Children's Bureau. In recognition of the collaborations needed to help prevent child abuse and neglect, the NCTSN has compiled a list of resources for advocates and policy makers, children and adolescents, educators, families and communities, and mental health and child welfare professionals.
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
When trust in the system is lost, ideals, trust and confidence are all qualifications that are destroyed to the detriment of the entire judicial system. Family court trial judge 246 Houston seem to openly express his role is helping litigants of the court. Not providing equity and justice consistent with American laws. This judge imply his court is not accountable to laws, rules, statutes, codes or the constitution out side his dictate of what the laws in his court will be.
Court 246 is a very dangerous institution that ignores due process and is bias to cultures and life styles disapprove by the court. This judge exhibits open disgust towards gays and lesbians, and don't seem to recognize the Supreme Court approval of same sex marriage.
The question can be asked, how is it such an intolerable, obviously very angry, unfair and bias judge exist in one of the most diversified counties in America.
Family court 246 openly violates citizens civil rights, and constitutional rights to include, 1st, 7th and 14th amendments. Left unchecked family court 246 will maintain its reputation as being one of the most dangerous, dysfunctional institutions for children and parents in America. Familyactivist@gmail.com / techparalegal.us
Saturday, April 15, 2017
Unless family courts understand that their prime focus must
be fairness, equality, and justice, these family courts can serve no useful
purpose. For too long, family court judges have used violence, threats, and
anger to demand respect and authority in the courts while being indifferent to
the situations such as pain and anguish and suffering to parents and children
associated with the cases they are charged to determine. let us get one thing
clear, parents who are litigants in family courts are mostly law-abiding
citizens providing for their families with no intention of altering their parental
The time comes when expertise is required, mostly to provide a framework that families encountering problems can work with. In many cases, children form part of disputes that the family court is responsible to address. It is not unusual to find situations where most problems have been mutually resolved, but the parties need legal confirmation and have no other option outside family courts. Although the best interest of children is one of the most important considerations that family court judges should keep in mind, parents' needs and responsibilities will always play a significant role in determining children's interests.
Family courts should not entertain the calculus that
overburdening one parent and placing them at a disadvantage in separation or
divorce, is in the best interest of anyone involved in a family dispute. Family
courts can be useful only if judges are litigant blind and resort to facts,
rules, codes, and laws associated with trial cases.
Family courts assume positions vital to cases prior to trial. The role of attorneys, their affluence, relationship with judges, should have no decisive effect on a case prior to trial. Attorneys should provide legal direction to the court involving cases and should advocate legal requirements for the case.
Gone are the days when attorneys seem to care about laws,
truth, or responsibility, although always charged with advocating for their
clients, family court attorneys go way beyond that role. They lie, cheat, and
shortcut the legal requirements of the court. Attorneys with small practices
seem to be far more worthless compared to large legal companies, yet large
companies are ridiculously expensive for reasons we can understand.
Family court judges are required to manage courts by providing justice based on evidence supported by laws, codes, rules, and opinions written and available for intelligent rulings. Family court judges seem to prefer using their preferential obviously biased interpretations to determine their rulings having nothing to do with legal requirements. Laws are provided to solve this very issue.
Justice is lost in family courts. Family court in America are
well known for characteristics not expected of an institution responsible for
managing delicate issues of any kind and certainly not associated with
families. Dealing with these court, one gets the distinct impression that law
and order have no role in the courts. The court seems to operate using modules
of intimidation, fear, piracy, and confusion. One gets the impression that the
court is one cover-up than another.
One judge makes an obvious error the other makes certain it is covered. The court seem to have waited attorneys ready to assist the court in accomplishing results detrimental to all parties involved with cases. Family courts seem to have no problem intimidating litigants, denying parties of their choosing due process, using children to punish parents they don't support in cases, having nothing to do with evidence or laws, using the threat of one party paying the other attorney fees, or simply refusing to bring to the court, motions, orders, or processes accepted by the court.
Judges of family courts assume the role of Lords, using any
means, wants, or likes to determine critical situations and decisions. Family
courts determine requirements for cases by setting levels of difficulty, the
more the judges despise one party the more difficult the bar of evidence, the
appropriateness for applicable laws, and the more personal influence negative
to the despised party is provided by the trial judges
Family court judges have a well-established reputation as bullies and many of their staff seem to simply adhere to their positions. These are resolute workers whose careers will forever be tainted and stained by the tragedies they witnessed originating from family courts in Houston Texas. They witness parents who are frightened of the trial judge for reasons having nothing to do with their legal process but angry, loud, disrespectful, arrogant, and most of all their reputation in the community for being judge, jury and executioner in cases they adjudicate.
Like pirates, the family court uses child support as a means of
destroying a parent, not of their liking, the ability to provide for their
family, and certainly defending themselves against to ravages of the court.
Family court judges in Houston know, that once a ruling is made against a party, not
of their liking it is all but impossible to get it set aside. They are aware of the finances and resources demanded of the courts and resources received as
incentives for their barbaric deeds
These judges do not waste much time, devising means to identify their preferred litigant in a case, and then institute processes aimed at crippling a litigant using temporary orders and other gimmicks. These orders are used to pave the way for the final blow when they strip their opponents of happiness, liberty, and property. Satisfied with their accomplishments, these judicial pirates simply move to acquire the next loot.
Family court judges should conform to laws and not latitudes given to them by their pairs. The playing field must be level with both parties to a dispute governed by legal requirements. Once a party to a dispute realizes the goal is moved to justify the ruling favoring the other party, regardless of how the decision seems to peers, that process is no longer authentic and will only serve to be divisive and contribute to anger, misgiving and disruption to families.
Sunday, April 9, 2017
Friday, April 7, 2017
Thursday, April 6, 2017