Saturday, April 15, 2017

THE DISGUSTING HIDDEN ROLE OF FAMILY COURTS.

 SOME EVIL DETRIMENTS TO CHILDREN, PARENTS, AND COMMUNITIES FROM POLICIES OF HOUSTON’S FAMILY COURTS

 

Unless family courts understand that their prime focus must be fairness, equality, and justice, these family courts can serve no useful purpose. For too long, family court judges have used violence, threats, and anger to demand respect and authority in the courts while being indifferent to the situations such as pain and anguish and suffering to parents and children associated with the cases they are charged to determine. let us get one thing clear, parents who are litigants in family courts are mostly law-abiding citizens providing for their families with no intention of altering their parental responsibilities.

The time comes when expertise is required, mostly to provide a framework that families encountering problems can work with. In many cases, children form part of disputes that the family court is responsible to address. It is not unusual to find situations where most problems have been mutually resolved, but the parties need legal confirmation and have no other option outside family courts. Although the best interest of children is one of the most important considerations that family court judges should keep in mind, parents' needs and responsibilities will always play a significant role in determining children's interests.

A picture containing text, covered, posing

Description automatically generated

Family courts should not entertain the calculus that overburdening one parent and placing them at a disadvantage in separation or divorce, is in the best interest of anyone involved in a family dispute. Family courts can be useful only if judges are litigant blind and resort to facts, rules, codes, and laws associated with trial cases.

 Family courts assume positions vital to cases prior to trial. The role of attorneys, their affluence, relationship with judges, should have no decisive effect on a case prior to trial. Attorneys should provide legal direction to the court involving cases and should advocate legal requirements for the case.

A picture containing text

Description automatically generated

Gone are the days when attorneys seem to care about laws, truth, or responsibility, although always charged with advocating for their clients, family court attorneys go way beyond that role. They lie, cheat, and shortcut the legal requirements of the court. Attorneys with small practices seem to be far more worthless compared to large legal companies, yet large companies are ridiculously expensive for reasons we can understand.

 Family court judges are required to manage courts by providing justice based on evidence supported by laws, codes, rules, and opinions written and available for intelligent rulings. Family court judges seem to prefer using their preferential obviously biased interpretations to determine their rulings having nothing to do with legal requirements. Laws are provided to solve this very issue.

A picture containing text, outdoor

Description automatically generated

Justice is lost in family courts. Family court in America are well known for characteristics not expected of an institution responsible for managing delicate issues of any kind and certainly not associated with families. Dealing with these court, one gets the distinct impression that law and order have no role in the courts. The court seems to operate using modules of intimidation, fear, piracy, and confusion. One gets the impression that the court is one cover-up than another.

One judge makes an obvious error the other makes certain it is covered. The court seem to have waited attorneys ready to assist the court in accomplishing results detrimental to all parties involved with cases. Family courts seem to have no problem intimidating litigants, denying parties of their choosing due process, using children to punish parents they don't support in cases, having nothing to do with evidence or laws, using the threat of one party paying the other attorney fees, or simply refusing to bring to the court, motions, orders, or processes accepted by the court.

A group of people on a stage

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Judges of family courts assume the role of Lords, using any means, wants, or likes to determine critical situations and decisions. Family courts determine requirements for cases by setting levels of difficulty, the more the judges despise one party the more difficult the bar of evidence, the appropriateness for applicable laws, and the more personal influence negative to the despised party is provided by the trial judges

 Family court judges have a well-established reputation as bullies and many of their staff seem to simply adhere to their positions. These are resolute workers whose careers will forever be tainted and stained by the tragedies they witnessed originating from family courts in Houston Texas. They witness parents who are frightened of the trial judge for reasons having nothing to do with their legal process but angry, loud, disrespectful, arrogant, and most of all their reputation in the community for being judge, jury and executioner in cases they adjudicate.

A picture containing clipart

Description automatically generated

Like pirates, the family court uses child support as a means of destroying a parent, not of their liking, the ability to provide for their family, and certainly defending themselves against to ravages of the court. Family court judges in Houston know, that once a ruling is made against a party, not of their liking it is all but impossible to get it set aside. They are aware of the finances and resources demanded of the courts and resources received as incentives for their barbaric deeds

 These judges do not waste much time, devising means to identify their preferred litigant in a case, and then institute processes aimed at crippling a litigant using temporary orders and other gimmicks. These orders are used to pave the way for the final blow when they strip their opponents of happiness, liberty, and property. Satisfied with their accomplishments, these judicial pirates simply move to acquire the next loot.

 Family court judges should conform to laws and not latitudes given to them by their pairs. The playing field must be level with both parties to a dispute governed by legal requirements. Once a party to a dispute realizes the goal is moved to justify the ruling favoring the other party, regardless of how the decision seems to peers, that process is no longer authentic and will only serve to be divisive and contribute to anger, misgiving and disruption to families.

No comments:

Post a Comment