Saturday, June 6, 2020

Are public institutions contributing to racial abuse in America?

Government institutions including public schools and colleges are contributing to racial abuse in America,

Jules Williams
Government and Public Service student Houston Community College.

American Institutions of higher learning have the “obligation” to work towards educational equality for residents who desire to advance themselves and communities. Community Colleges are in a unique position to provide services to communities in order to ensure every resident has an equal opportunity to provide for their families, have equal opportunities to education, health and by extension employment.

The Texas legislature has declared without ambiguity the need for institutions of higher learning to use every means at their disposal to make possible educational opportunities for every qualified resident. It is unfortunate that even in these challenging times when economic inequality is a national problem, institutions of higher learning that depend on tax subsidies  for their operations do not seem to appreciate the opportunities that are at their disposal to aid in furthering the effort towards economic inequality through higher education for every qualified resident.

Providing educational opportunities for adults has been documented as worthy and encouraged by state legislatures. Federal and State funds have been provided to ensure these programs are available to meet the educational objective of qualified residents. One unfortunate problem among others that is responsible for thousands of adults being denied higher educational opportunities by institutions of higher learning, is arbitrary interpretation of local requirements for financing adult education.

Laws, codes and other regulatory requirements and not constructed in a vacuum. Accompanying every regulation, are two very important components; the spirit that necessitates the need for regulation and the letter of the regulation. Institutions have to consider intent of Legislature and the wording of the legislation. For example, the Houston Community College demands a high school diploma in order to obtain financial aid for adults attempting to enroll in colleges of higher education. Some of these applicants are 50 years of age and older who have worked for many years providing services and contributing to the economy. Yet educational opportunities are casually denied to these adult applicants. No one will accept that almost 50 years ago the Houston Community College was created without the spirit for the formation of the college being considered, thus the term “community.

Public institutions cannot be allowed to continue to display systematic indifference to the needs of especially minority residents. These institutions have to provide programs to alleviate social and economic problems of the communities they serve. Although legislative intervention does not seem to be the problem in this instant, since both Federal and State Legislatures have expressed the need for adult education. Another obvious problem experience when dealing with public service employees is that of chronic comfort. There is the feeling by many who seek public services that those that manage these institutions lack training in dealing with social and community need of residents. The experience of going to financial Aid offices at public service institutions is worse than a trip to the dentist or being audited by the IRS. Its like students are beggars, outcasts seeking handouts from wealthy privileged institutions.

It is obvious that the Executive director Financial Aid HCC is not aware of the significance of obtaining certification from Houston Community College. His casual statement regarding the value of certificates in Legal Office Management and Legal Assistant is worrying. The requirements for receiving financial aid are clear. There is a reason for HCC to pay attention to its “TO DO LIST” requirements inclusion of the term “equivalent”, since that is exactly what the provision entails. 

The spirit of this requirement is clearly to ensure applicants to colleges are suitably able to successfully complete higher education programs; the Texas legislature has provided several options to be used by State Colleges to ensure they do not inhibit educational opportunities for adults due to financing. How then is it possible for a student who has undertaken two college courses, gained two certificates in nine months, maintain a 3.5 GPA, obtained graduation requirements for AAS degree in Government and Public service, has completed every course on time, has no legal issues, is a legal resident of Texas and is not indebted to any State or Federal authority,  not qualify for financial assistance to complete the final semester for a degree; A student that has  already enrolled with a University to begin studies for a degree in  Political Science;  The student has successfully completed Federal and State Financial Aid requirements and has meet State and Federal provisions for educational aid assistance programs.

How can any institution accept turning away adult students from completing higher education using the sole premise that a high school diploma is not available? These adult students have been contributing to the financial operations of these institutions for decades, yet inconsiderate decisions by these benefiting institutions are stifling the ability for these adults to obtain higher education. There are other programs and procedures available to Community Colleges, yet administrators of College financial aid programs  ignore alternative options and continue to deny adults access to higher education, inconsistent with desires of applicable legislative requirements clearly documented in the Texas Education Code and possible Texas and National Constitutional provisions, Federal and State Laws. (The Declaration of Independence).

How many qualified adults are being refused enlisting in Houston Community Colleges because they are not in possession of a High School Diploma but have completed certification in College courses that clearly meet or exceed the equivalent of a GED or clearly shows their ability to excel in higher education programs.
Financial Assistance to Students
The purpose of financial aid is to provide financial assistance to students who would otherwise be unable to attend college.
Texas Education Code
Sec. 56.002
Declaration of Policy
The legislature, giving due consideration to the historical and continuing interest of the people of the State of Texas in encouraging deserving and qualified persons to realize their aspirations for education beyond high school finds and declares that post secondary education for those who desire such an education and are properly qualified therefor is important to the welfare and security of this state and the nation and, consequently, is an important public purpose.

 The legislature finds and declares that the state can achieve its full economic and social potential only if every individual has the opportunity to contribute to the full extent of his capabilities and only when financial barriers to his economic, social, and educational goals are removed. It is, therefore, the policy of the legislature and the purpose of this Chapter to establish financial assistance programs to enable qualified students to receive a post secondary education. Added by Acts 1975, 64th Leg., p. 2323, ch. 720, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1975.

Sec. 56.051.  EMERGENCY LOANS.  Each institution of higher education may establish an emergency loan program under which students are loaned money to pay tuition, fees, and the costs of textbooks.

Added by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 708, Sec. 15(a), eff. Aug. 26, 1985.  Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 805, Sec. 4, eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1181 (S.B. 1227), Sec. 17, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 56.052.  ELIGIBILITY.  (a)   The governing board of each institution shall adopt rules establishing eligibility criteria.  The rules must allow eligible students to obtain loans on the basis of the order of receipt of applications, except as provided by Subsection (b).
(b)  The governing board may adopt rules that allow the institution to select loan recipients from the eligible applicants according to financial need, regardless of when their applications are received, if money available for the program is insufficient to provide loans to each eligible applicant.

Added by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 708, Sec. 15(a), eff. Aug. 26, 1985.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1181 (S.B. 1227), Sec. 18, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 56.011
Resident Undergraduate Student Assistance
The governing board of each institution of higher education shall cause to be set aside not less than 15 percent of any amount of tuition charged to a resident undergraduate student under Section 54.0513 (Designated Tuition) in excess of $46 per semester credit hour. The funds set aside under this section by an institution shall be used to provide financial assistance for resident undergraduate students enrolled in the institution.
To be eligible for assistance under this section, a student must establish financial need in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Priority shall be given to students who meet the coordinating board definition of financial need and whose cost for tuition and required fees is not met through other non-loan financial assistance programs.
The financial assistance provided under this section may include grants, scholarships, work-study programs, student loans, and student loan repayment assistance .Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1321, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.Amended by: Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1243 (H.B. 700), Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2015.
Applying for Financial Aid
All applications for financial aid should be completed by May 1 for students enrolling in September, and November 1 for students enrolling in January. Applications are accepted throughout the academic year, but awards made after the recommended deadlines depend on fund availability. A new application must be completed for each academic year.
Eligibility is determined by completing the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). For more information on financial aid application procedures, please visit the financial aid website at
The information provided in the FAFSA provides a consistent way of measuring the ability of families and/or students to pay educational costs. The student is determined to have need if the cost of education exceeds the student’s available resources, based upon a standardized formula that was established by Congress. All allowable educational expenses are considered when financial aid applications are reviewed.
The Student Aid Report that the student will receive after filing the FAFSA need not be submitted to the Financial Aid Office. The Financial Aid Office will download reports electronically.
Requirements for Student Financial Aid
In order to receive financial aid, students must have completed the entire admissions process and be accepted into a degree or eligible certificate program. You may be eligible for financial assistance if you are:
·        A citizen or permanent resident of the U.S. or Trust Territories;
·        In good academic standing and making satisfactory academic progress according to the standards and practices of HCC (see);
·        In compliance with draft (Selective Service) registration requirements;
·        Not in default in the repayment of any educational loans or owe a refund on any Title IV grant program at any institution.
How to Keep Receiving Financial Aid
To receive financial aid, all new, transfer, continuing and returning students must demonstrate they are successfully working toward completing their degree program in a timely manner.

Every semester (Fall, Spring and Summer), Houston Community College is required by the federal government to evaluate whether you meet the Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) requirements to receive financial aid.
·   In order for you to continue receiving financial aid, you must meet the SAP requirements (see below). 
·   SAP Requirements to maintain your financial aid are not the same as Academic requirements. Please visit a Counseling Department near you for those details. 
·   Don't wait until it's too late before you understand what's needed to keep receiving financial aid (see below). 
SAP Requirements to Receive Financial Aid

Maintain a 2.0 cumulative grade point average (GPA).
Complete and pass a minimum of 67% of ALL the credit hours attempted. For every class hour you attempt, you MUST complete and pass a minimum of 67% of them. Remember, all “attempted” credit hours is every hour you are enrolled, including repeat courses, developmental courses, and EVEN courses with grades of “F”, “W”, “I”, or “IP."
Complete degree or certificate requirements within 150% of the minimum number of hours required to graduate.

 The percentage is a bit confusing. Here is a simple equation – multiply the minimum number of credit hours to complete your degree or certificate by 1.5. Let’s say your degree program takes 60 credit hours to graduate. 60 multiplied by 1.5 equals 90. This means to remain eligible for financial aid – you must complete your program with no more than 90 attempted and completed hours.
How Financial Aid is intended to work consistent with State and Federal objectives.
Financial aid awards are based on your enrollment status as of the 14th calendar day of the semester. Any course added after that time will not be covered by financial aid and will be billed directly to you.
Students should remember that:
·        Financial aid cannot be used for non-credit courses offered through the Continuing Education Program.
·        Financial aid cannot be used for audited courses.
·        Withdrawal during the first two weeks of any semester will result in the cancellation of all financial aid. Students will be billed by the business office for 50 percent of their tuition, all fees, and any bookstore charges. For students that fall into this category, a Return of Title IV funds calculation will be completed to determine if the students are eligible for a post withdrawal disbursement.
·        More information regarding withdrawals after the first 14 days of the semester is available in the section entitled “Policy for Refunds & Repayments of Cash Disbursements of Title IV Financial Aid (Withdrawal Information)”.
·        Financial aid does not cover the cost of any course and/or related books for which a student registers and never attends. The charges for any such course become the responsibility of the student who will be billed directly by the business office.
·        Financial aid is NOT available for the Winter session.
Student Responsibilities
All financial aid applicants are assumed to be familiar with the contents of the HCC catalog. Students are responsible for reading and understanding all forms they are asked to sign and should keep copies of all documents submitted to the Financial Aid Office. Students and their families should be aware that they are completing applications for federal, state, and college funds.
Financial aid recipients must inform the Financial Aid Office in writing of any change in name, address, marital status, family size, or financial circumstances. Deliberately misreporting can result in criminal and civil liabilities.
Housatonic Community College expects you, the student, to initiate the application process in a timely manner, and considers it your responsibility to complete the application on time. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.
Students with questions concerning the accuracy or completeness of their applications should contact the Financial Aid Office. If your application is in any stage of processing or review and you have not received an official notification of financial aid at the time you wish to enroll, you will be responsible for your tuition bill at the time of registration, and must make payment arrangements with the Business Office. If payment arrangements have not been made and you do not have an official notification of financial aid, your classes will, in all probability, be cancelled.
Late applications will be awarded on a fund’s available basis. Application materials cannot be accepted after a student’s last date of attendance.
The only formal announcement of financial aid is an award letter or email sent by the Financial Aid Office. Information online at myCommNet is not official unless you have received an official email award notification or have been sent an award letter.
Please note… Applicants are responsible for completing all Federal eligibility and file completion requirements as soon as possible. Under NO circumstances will financial aid be available for the fall semester unless ALL requirements are satisfied by November 15, or for the spring semester by April 15.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy For Student Financial Aid Recipients
A student receiving Federal Title IV financial aid or other financial aid directly administered or certified by the college must maintain satisfactory academic progress towards the completion of a certificate or degree program of study. Satisfactory academic progress for financial aid recipients is measured by both quantitative and qualitative standards and is an assessment of a student’s cumulative academic record at the college. Students should be aware that the Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy for financial aid recipients differs from the institutional Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy.
The current Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy is available online at, in Appendix XI of the college Policies section of the catalog, or in the financial aid office.
The practice by Houston Community College and other institutions of higher education to deny qualified adults opportunities to better their lives, communities, and country by denying access to higher education simply because of not having a high school diploma is inconsistent with the intent of State and Federal educational and developmental objectives. This practice has led and is presently contributing to social and economic inequalities in mostly vulnerable communities in America and specifically Texas. It is clear that there exist an interpretation and not a legislative issue.
I am calling on the Administration of Community Colleges and institutions of higher learning, The Chancellor and Executive Director Financial Aid of Houston Community College  to review legislative provisions of State,  Federal and educational agencies, The Texas Educational Code, The Laws of Higher Education and the Constitution of  Texas and the United States to ensure both the spirit and letter of laws relating to adult higher education are adhered to.

Sunday, March 10, 2019


I am not an Attorney. This post does not constitute Legal advice.

Well the mid term elections have come and gone. Divorces are filed at continuing paces, dockets are processed, parents show up in court and the process continues in Harris County Family Courts.

What changes are observed in the courts? well the courts seem to be better managed, cases seem to be processed in a more timely manner and the courts, to some extent seem more  respectful of litigants.

The question remains, are litigants satisfied with the level of fairness and justice provided by individual judges in the Harris County family courts or are our newly sworn judges simply accepting changes to personnel and accept the status Quo. There are families from previous years that were separated from their children who continue to go to courts with no resolution in site. There are cases that were pending that were closed with no consideration to injustices that originated from prior judges.

Unlike publicized efforts by District Attorney's office to reduce mass incarceration and acknowledge injustices involving drug use charges, the Attorney General office has not addressed disenfranchisement  of families, the punitive administration of child support, what happens to children after 18 years of age when paid to care court appointed parents no longer receive funding from the court system and the children are discarded like garbage to the spoils of society.

Or are the newly elected judges going to advocate for family law reform or simply take their chances that they will be reelected for a second term.

It is obvious that many parents are suffering the loss of their families as a result of reckless family laws. What is worse is that many family court judges are creating conditions for parents to be isolated from their children. Family courts seem to believe there has to be a winner and a loser to every case. What is lost,  is that most parents enter a divorce proceeding as hard working, caring and loving to their children. some how family court judges find ways to destroy what remains of the family by ignoring Family Codes, Rules, Statutes and even the Constitution.

These judges act more like Gods and less than judges. Here are a few examples.

One of the first things that should occur after a complaint is filed with the court, including family court is the case is entered onto a docket and a hearing is scheduled giving the Respondent the opportunity to hear and responded to charges. In family courts injunctions are frequently filed with the courts. That gives advocate and dishonest judges the first opportunity to decide the outcome of the case.Like every human being judges have personal, political and other biases.

The courts are supposed to ensure the respondent to a complaint was duly notified and prof of service returned to the court. Judges have to ensure they have jurisdiction to hear complaints and render judgement over the respondent. Too frequently, family courts ignore this basic requirement  and in many cases, a parent is thrown off their homes, they lost the companionship of their children, they are forced to pay in certain instances 51% of their income to the child support system and live with the threat of being sent to jail for visiting their home and children and  for failing to pay child support even for reasons of hardship created by the judges.

Remember many parents experienced these atrocities without knowing of hearings or notice to be in court. the judge simply begins the hearing grants a default judgement and refuses to grant a hearing for a motion to modify or set aside the default judgement. The judge simply initiate the destruction of this family and its down hill for that family from then on.

If only family court judges would adhere to existing family laws and codes, follow the required procedures for evidence impartial and fair,  many parents would cope with divorces and live manageable lives.

Rules regarding conservatory, property division, visitation and child support are ignored by family court judges who seem unable to resist  needlessly punishing  one parent, thereby destroying the children involved. Family laws were intended to manage family disputes and preserve best interest of children.
In our legal system nothing was taken to chance. Our fore fathers had witness many austerities committed against vulnerable individuals using the guise of law and  provided this country with a Constitution and the bill of rights. Our laws are what the judges say but this, ironically is a good thing.  What was not seen is the commercialization of the legal process and difficulty for average citizens to receive justice from the courts. Law makers ignore the Constitution by giving judges authority to ignore common laws and simply enact laws from the bench.
Its almost impossible to hold a judge responsible for the wrongs, or crimes committed in the name of representing laws and justice.

Our system is supposed to be based on precedence. That means the decisions compiled by judges on a repeated basis forms common opinions and establishes laws. This is important since judges are supposed to conform their opinions on decisions commonly made by other judges.

Decisions from higher courts are considered superior to that of lower courts and the US Supreme court is held as the ultimate decision maker of the land, a fact that seem to be lost with family courts.
Institution like ACLU have been fighting for preservation of our Civil Rights for many years. However, our rights are being threatened from so many areas, that our freedom and liberty is constantly being degraded. Family structures are being destroyed.

The sad reality is our rights are under attach by the very institutions charged with adjudicating justice and equity for every American.

Sunday, December 9, 2018



Not an attorney. this article is not intended to be legal advice. Consult an attorney for legal advice.

How can it be that Harris County Family Courts are so conclusively corrupt yet Law makers, Court Administrators and the office of the Attorney General does not seem to be aware or simply ignore obvious  wide spread racketeering and corruption that is degrading the reputation of the courts.

Or could it be that these officials, agencies and institutions are well aware of Harris County Court Corruption but are either burying their heads in the sand or are simply ignoring the plight of thousands of especially vulnerable Harris County residents that are unable to resist judicial assault from the hands of family courts judges.

Law makers provided judges with great latitude and immunity from prosecution for obvious injustices and crimes. They, in essence tie the hands of hard working and law abiding parents, while providing court officials with enormous levels of resources, for providing protection to court processes, judges and their staff.

        Children? who cares about children?

Can any one believe Texas cannot afford to employ separate clerks for the 1st and 14th intermediate courts of appeal serving Harris County Texas? Clerks are provided lots of administrative power and and selected by justices of the court. Having one clerk for both courts, short circuit litigants chanced of obtaining justice.

Clerk Christopher Prine is closely related to Past Judge Charley Prine. Charley Prine up to November 2018 was the most aggressive, controversial judge serving the county. Also, the family court system was the most corrupt and manipulating government institution operating in the County. Judges constructed a ring of comradeship  that  made public opposition impossible. Yet one Clerk made the determination as to which appeals court an appellant was placed in.

Can anyone contemplate court reporters in Harris County family courts charge about $500.00 per hour for recording testimony? Family Court 246 Harris County charged  $2400.00 for 10 hours of trial. Of essence most of the 10 hours were spent in court deliberations and procedures having nothing to do with testimony recording. This period also included 90 minutes daily for lunch.

These reporters make use of taxpayers court material and equipment and are paid salaries in the professional range. How can Harris County justify these fees. A reasonable conclusion could be that these fees are charged to hinder average Americans to afford justice.

Family court 309 charged  $125.00 for a 10 minute hearing where the Judge simply reset the hearing by requesting the petitioner's  personal phone number and promising to contact him  when she was finished reviewing a motion to reinstate a case that was falsely dismissed by Judge Charley Prine who lied on an official document claiming there was no activity in the case for 6 months. A simple review of the court docket will clearly show both  opponents and petitioner  were in court regarding that case 5 times in that period.

      Extend the case milk law abiding parents.

Harris County Family Courts stage judicial kidnapping of children from caring parents to parents they favor without the support of evidence or law. These judges make rulings that are so outrageous that they impose gag orders to protect their injustices and lawlessness. Harris County family courts impose default judgments without notice or process service to parties affected in many instanced, the court has knowledge that the party was not available or the court had neither certificate or prof of service, mandatory to provide jurisdiction for authenticating a case.

Harris Court family court judges refrain from providing rational for verdicts simply because they cannot provide statements of facts  and conclusions of law. These judges are intentional law breakers who protect their lawlessness using high costs that are clearly outside the  reach of especially minority  Americans.

A few hours in family court 310 would leave someone even a novice,  with no doubt that Associate Judge Conrad is either incompetent, bias, vindictive or punitive. After all,  the judge started a hearing without swearing or affirming any party, then concluded by asking the respondent whether she opposed the motion filed by the petitioner, then simply denied the  motions to restore the case to  conditions of  pre- trial since the case was dismissed along with all temporary orders associated  rulings, including salary garnishment and also to reinstate the case, since reinstatement was timely filed and accepted by the court there were hearings attended by both parties weeks prior, yet Associate judge Conrad found legal cover to deny the motions using Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure, 165 a.

I encourage every reader who is not convince of the of judge Conrad lack of understand or simple disregard for Texas rules to read this very simple and uncomplicated rule.

I met a young man in court family court 310 who has made a game of family court gimmicks. He has not only predicted the method of operations of the court but the time it takes to go through routines of the judges and attorneys. They are very predictable; extend the cases to  milk every penny from hard working parents.In his case the family court judge uses another method to pirate funds from this parent, given the judges by law makers. THE ATTORNEY AT LITEM AND AMACUS were given to judges by the to legislature  to further their reach into the pockets of  residents who have limited resources. These judges act as  judicial pirates even more  dangerous compared to pirates using riffles.

This young  man was paying his attorney fees and the cost for the attorney at litem yet there was no urgency or necessity to complete his case. The case has already lasted more than 2 years and as predicted the attorneys gabbled together and the referee, the associate judge Conrad simply reset the case and their corrupt gimmick continues. Another hearing, more wasted time,  a few more dollars pirated by the Texas family court system.

The best situation for Harris County Courts is the election results of 2018. All suspect judges lost their reelection attempts including Charley Prine and judges from courts 309 and 310 breaking the established ring of judicial corruption that existed in Harris County . This in essence brought to an end the existing web of corrupt associated with  judges operating the courts. Unfortunately, Harris County litigants will have to contend with web attachments that will continue to exist between individual judicial affiliations and appeals courts, politicians and judicial administrative personnel.

Fortunately, new judges will not have access to and established ring and be in collaboration with an army of corrupt judges that existed prior to 2018.

That is certainly good news for Harris County but particularly for the Judaical System of Harris County Texas.

      Family courts pirate money from parents.

Below is yet another case depicting corruption involving family court 310 Harris County Texas. Exhibits and further documents are available by Google court 310 Harris County.

Not endorsing comments or material associate with the following material. Material used for comparative and support of  personal experiences from family courts Harris County Texas.


Issues Presented: Unedited.

I.    Is the Infamous and Oppressive 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, d/b/a Judge Lisa Millard, d/b/a Associate Judge Conrad Moren, and all Clerks and other Sundry 310th Court Employees Committing Fraud and Racketeering While Simultaneously Contemning and Defying their Sworn Oaths of Office to “daily protect, defend, support, and uphold the Federal, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, AGAIN?”

      Associate judge assume the role of pirate

I.    Is the Infamous and Oppressive 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, d/b/a Judge Lisa Millard, d/b/a Associate Judge Conrad Moren, and all Clerks and other Sundry 310th Court Employees Committing Fraud and Racketeering While Simultaneously Contemning and Defying their Sworn Oaths of Office to “daily protect, defend, support, and uphold the Federal, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, AGAIN?”

II.  Is d/b/a Judge Millard and her Pay-to-Play Court of the 310th Trying to Do to Me What they Did to Clifford Hall when she held him in contempt of court and fraudulently imprisoned him for overpaying back child support in the amount of $3,000.00 and spending too much time with his eleven year old son who adored him because the court modified child support and visitation orders without even bothering to notify Mr. Hall, let alone giving him a fair hearing or trial after proper notice of such hearing that never occurred, thus emasculating his Fourteenth Amendment constitutional right to due process of law and to equal protections of the law?

See Exhibits I, II, and III Above, Printed from the Public Website of the Harris County Clerk, Chris Daniel, and Scanned and Uploaded onto Computer (And Mailed to Others for Safekeeping in the Event Harris County once again tries to take away my liberty, as they already kidnapped my only child and gave him to a sexually deviant pervert and a criminal (see public records of Matthew James Worrell in Harris County, Texas 2005-2006, and mugshots from Lewisville, Texas around 1998 or 1999)  who threatened to “ruin” my life, along with his family for not having an abortion in 2006 that he, without my knowledge or consent, scheduled several times over the Public Internet with his Credit Card–he even misspelled my name, of this, Judge Millard, Moren, and the 310th Court Staff had evidence on file– so he could let his wife with whom he committed adultery and stole another man’s family (also on record in the 310th–See divorce papers for Nancy Gray-Dufour, now Nancy Gray-Worrell) force my only child, my son, now age seven (7), who was kidnapped under the color of law at age 5 1/2, right before he started kindergarten.

Evidence Presented:
First, If one scrutinizes the dates printed in the bottom right-hand corner of Exhibits I, II, and III above, and contrasts those dates with the alleged “Judgments/Events” (the tab on the Harris County Clerk’s public website when one searches Cause No. 2007-05391 after clicking on the Search Records and Documents option on the left hand side of the screen), one will notice that on April 10, 2014, there was no ” Motion for Contempt of Court (Temporary Orders)” or Hearing, certainly not of which I was noticed or that was entered. 

    Judicial Piracy

 However, it is exactly such a fraudulent and backdated “Motion…” that does not appear on the “Judgments/Events” Tab of the Harris County Clerk’s website until May 14, 2014–I printed on May 16, 2014 as demonstrated in Exhibit II above.
Next, one will notice on Exhibit III, “Service/Notice” Tab under Cause No. 2007-05391, printed by myself from the public Harris County Clerk’s website in May 2014 as indicated by the date on such Exhibit (See “Precept still in possession of agency for process) that I still have yet to be properly noticed for the fake March 19, 2014 hearing that obviously never occurred, or for any other hearing for Contempt of Court and Child Support Enforcement, as falsely alleged by Attorney 

Lawrence/”Larry” Rothenberg (mailed documents to the wrong address–his client–….three times material…and a green certified return receipt request filled out with MY name …stapled to the bac of the envelopes with the correct mailing address and apparently lied and filed malicious documents perjured that falsely allege that for a year No child support paid which is a total lie and clear scheme to falsely imprison, or, “kidnap” under Texas Penal Code statute) for vexatious and harassing litigant (the sexually deviant pervert and criminal who has intention to distribute large amounts of M.D.M.A., DUI/DWI, and, since he was disrespectful to authorities and they had to take a blood sample when he was pulled over, was found with five (5) drugs/alcohol in his system, just that could be identified as it appears from substance screening reports that there were more trace unidentified substances in his system, Matthew James Worrell/a.k.a. “Matt James Worrell”–as whited out by a former Attorney Bruce Buskirk in collusion with Donna Everson, the exclusive attorney and guardian ad litem  for children of choice for Judges Millard and Moren as she is one of their highest campaign contributors 

(See Texas Tribune’s latest judicial campaign contribution figures, as reported), and notorious CPS Program Supervisor fraudster and child trafficker, Cheryl Harvick of Brazoria  County/Region 6 and her caseworker, Lesly Damian-Murray of Angleton, Texas, to make Mr. Worrell appear to have no searchable criminal record when they colluded to kidnap my only child as soon as my son’s father found out on May 04, 2012 that I was at the hospital with my son for the purpose of a sexual assault exam at the advice of my son’s physician, police officers (not the same ones who retaliated with Cheryl Harvick for making a complaint about her caseworker to the Office of Consumer Affairs), and at the command of Texas state law for which it is a harsh crime with a $2,000.00 fine not to report the allegations my son made regarding time spent at his father’s and with “The Visitor”–‘a teenager with black, spiky hair.'”

Concluding Questions:

I.     Will Judge Millard, Conrad Moren, and the 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas and my son’s fathers attorneys and privately hired process server try to backdate and/or falsify a Proof of Service Return with the Court to make it appear that I was served and summoned to court, as is required by law when one faces jail time (six months/180 days)?
II.  Will the Court then issue a fraudulent and unconstitutional Writ of Capias, or bench warrant, to have me arrested for what they might allege as “failure to appear” (even though no due process of law will have occurred)?

III.  If the Court takes aforementioned fraudulent, and, by law, criminal actions against me, will they issue a criminal, civil, or a combination of criminal and civil charge so as to strategically deny me the right to a court-appointed attorney for which I would certainly qualify even though I would face jail time/false imprisonment, a federal offense?

IV.     Is the 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas retaliating for the fact that I filed a federal lawsuit (See U.S. Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal’s Cause of Action No. 13-20605 in New Orleans for violation of mine and my only child’s First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional and civil rights), by myself, in propria persona, initially listing the 310th Court as a Defendant?

I demand fear I will be revered 

V.  Is Judge Lisa Millard emotionally unstable and guilty of treason against her duty to uphold the Supreme law and Constitution of our Land?

VI.  Would you trust Judge Lisa Millard to oversee a matter that involved your child?

VII.  Does Lisa Millard have any fiduciary interests (of conflict) with Child Advocates, Inc., Donna Everson’s employer for CPS?

VIII.  How much money did Lisa Millard earn for d/b/a Harris County, …., in 2012 and 2013 in a racketeering scheme, if any, with CPS and other BAR members and non-for-profits and Vince Ryan’s CPS court Prosecutor in the 310th Court, William Sumpter Frazier (who has the audacity and impropriety to chew on a cigar in court and use the “f” word while mocking distressed parents–somebody’s mother or father–to inappropriately bias others in court by insinuating that they are “looney birds,” by ordering perfectly healthy and normal, intelligent children into foster care, adoptions, institutions, by ordering perfectly loving and protective, healthy parents into “no contact” orders for a year before then ordering them into “SAFE” access and visitation sites that are 100% non-transparent with their donations and funding in the state of Texas–that is, currently, at least– and, finally, for enforcing child support on indigent single mothers in custody switching scams fueled by funding and kickbacks and campaign contributions from the H.H.S. in the form of (IR)”Responsible Fatherhood” state block grant Federal funding?

IX.     Did it give the “appearance of bias or prejudice” (Grounds for Immediate Recusal of a Judge and Reason for Transfer that, according to unified child court Communist social worker propaganda, will not happen) against me, a forced, self-represented litigant and mother of one very healthy, intelligent, and adorable little boy, when d/b/a Judge Lisa Millard took off her black robe (stepping out of her judicial role) on February 27, 2013 at the “Civil Building” Courthouse located at 201 Caroline, Houston, Texas  77002, came down to the cafeteria in the basement on the “break” that she called during the final trial for which I was not properly noticed and at which I was overruled on submitting all exculpatory evidence in my favor, right after my son’s father, the Petitioner and “Intervenor,” in said cause for “sole ‘managing’ ‘conservator ship’,” exited the cafeteria in the direction of the hallway from which Judge Lisa Millard came over to my table, where I had a witness, and said very menacingly and sarcastically threatened (just before she “ruled” on the pre-determined case as she signed all non-agreed, no-contract and no-contact “orders” null and void for the other parties before she allowed me to speak …but not to present any of my own or contravening evidence and reminded me repeatedly that her court was “not a ‘Constitutional Court!'”,

 “Well hello, Miss Saloom, I made a special point just to be here for you today.”  Her associate judge, Conrad Moren, DOES the dirty work as often as possible.  But then again, why wouldn’t he?  Afterall, he has Executive “Immunity” from Powers of Coast Guard (ha-ha-ha)!
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Real Jury, as Sovereign U.S. citizens of the Republics U.S. and Texas, and others, who are charged with the duty of electing such public officials to SERVE US, and I speak to the REAL Americans, What is Your Opinion?

Should you sign the Petition(s) attached to this blog to :
a.  Remove Judge Lisa Millard from the Bench
b. Sign the Petition (also attached to this blog) to Remove All Charges Against Clifford Hall, and/or
c.  Should You/We Start Our Own Petition To Bring My Only Child, Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom, home to me, UNSUPERVISED, in Addition to Calling for An Audit of the 310th Court and CPS files for the Purpose of Returning All Children Who Were Denied a Voice in Court and Improperly and Unconstitutionally “Removed,” or “Kidjacked” from the only parent(s) they had known ?

Stop family courts. Rescue our children.

d. Should Judge Lisa A. Millard and  Associate Judge Conrad Moren in the 310th Court of Harris County, Texas recused in the cause of myself and my only child?  Does there appear to be bias in Joni Saloom’s case?  Saloom has been allowed no meaningful contact with her now almost eight year-old son, her only property “child,” since he was 5 1/2–2 1/2 years ago though she was his only consistent and primary caregiver since his birth?  Would it matter knowing that Judge Millard moderated a CLE course the subject of which was how to not allow oneself to be “recused?”

e.  Should Matthew James Worrell  and his accomplices (including Kim Abernethy, CPS licensed, private”play therapist,”(therapeutic deceiver, that is),  Cheryl Harvick, Brazoria County CPS Supervisor who, with the help of complicit police officers in Pearland and Houston, Texas Officers Paul Elton and William Lilly, kidnapped my little boy, all of alleged father’s attorneys who knowingly took false affidavits an coached client to lie to officers of the court and on court record, Lesly Damian-Murray, CPS caseworker, Karen Coblentz, CPS Program Director for Brazoria County, Robin Gray/Robin Nelson (CPS Caseworker III employed at the Children’s Assessment 

Center/C.A.C., in Harris County, Debra Hatley, her supervisor, Tonya Clay (her Director), Dedra Latasha Hardaway (Brazoria County/Alvin, Texas, CPS caseworker who most likely referred Mr. Worrell to a subversive, on-the-list of cooperative counselors, the Worrell family, including Nancy Gray-Worrell and her family (who had prior knowledge and fair warning of what this man was capable of doing to me and my son as he and his mother had a documented history of kidnapping and secreting my child during my primary managing conservatorship and making numerous false reports to CPS and police to try to get me arrested and steal my child),  be prosecuted for, inter alia, malicious prosecution, perjury, repeated harassment, stalking, intention to cause severe emotional affliction and distress, extortion, fraud, forgery, obstructing justice by lying or misleading officers of the law, failure to protect a possibly vulnerable small child while his brain was still growing at a critical age, financial crimes, defrauding the federal government for abusing Title IV-D and attempting Title IV-E funding, defrauding the state of Texas’ Office of Child Support Enforcement, Committing Crimes Against the state in the form of Government Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, mismanagement of state and federal appropriated funds, negligence, intent to kidnap a child under the color of law with malice, criminal conspiracy to kidnap or secrete a child, interference with child custody, child enticement, and defamation of character with malice, falsifying government documents, cruelty to a child, and/or coaching a five year old to describe in great detail disgusting sexual acts to multiple community professionals by the people who stood to profit the most?
f. Would it make a difference to start Court-Watching (see the Movement in the 1980’s who did just that in the family courts in Harris County, Texas);

g. Wold it make a positive difference to bombard the 310th Court Clerk, Chris Daniel, Harris County Clerk’s office and private line, Vince Ryan’s Office, and Judge Ed Emmett, head of the Harris County Children’s Commissioners Court who profits and pays all of alleged guilty parties to act in the worst interest of children and failing to protect theirs and their parents’ constitutional rights, as herein charged?

h. Should we bombard Brazoria County Court Officials and Judges with Phonecalls, Court-Watching, Letters, Petitions, at City Council Meetings, etc., regarding their public (on the Internet–See Jeri Yenne, D.A.’s statements regarding CPS) refusal to obey Fifth Circuit Court and Texas state law and CPS mandated policy to respect the constitutional and civil rights of parents and children who are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, and not the other way around?
Call or e-mail me any time at : (713) 240-1727;; or write to me about your story or ideas/opinions/actions at c/o 4430 Morris Drive, Pearland, Texas  77584.
Legal Disclaimer:

(1) This post is made in good faith with the hope of deterrence of crimes  those hired to serve and protect the Real America and the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real Republic US of America.

(2) All of the content in this post is protected by the First Amendment to the Federal US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights as ratified and applied through the Fourteenth Amendment as noticed and sufficiently informed.

(3) If anyone desires a retraction or modification of content in this post based in good faith, please contact author of this blog and said author will reasonably and lawfully act.

  Demand justice from Harris County family courts

I am once again calling for a review of all 10 family courts operation in Harris county in an effort to prevent judicial crimes committed against Harris County residents. In particular review of cases involving Conservatory, Court reporters, property distribution and child support, document manipulation including documents that are supposed to be transferred from the family courts to the courts of Appeal, witness tampering and cases involving  constitutional, civil and due process violations.

The good news for residents of  Harris County Texas is the Court system has bottom when comes to integrity, it is at an all time low and can only get better, providing hope for fairer, more equitable and just legal decisions for residents of this great County.