Sunday, August 27, 2023


Jules Williams

Date: 8/27/2003.

1.     Lack of Expertise: One of the primary complications that may arise from promoting untrained personnel to facilities directors and Managers is the lack of expertise in specialized areas. Untrained personnel are typically responsible for cleaning and maintenance tasks, which may not equip them with the necessary knowledge and skills to handle complex systems such as electrical, air-conditioning, and plumbing trades. This could lead to inadequate maintenance, inefficient energy management, and potential safety hazards.

2.     Inadequate Training: Promoting untrained personnel to facilities directors and Managers without providing adequate training can further exacerbate the lack of expertise. Without proper training on building automation systems, energy management techniques, and sciences related to indoor air quality, untrained personnel may struggle to effectively manage billion-dollar facilities. This could result in increased energy consumption, higher maintenance costs, and compromised safety standards.

3.     Limited Resources: Another challenge that may arise from promoting untrained personnel to facilities directors is the limited availability of resources. Large public-funded school districts often have tight budgets, making it difficult to allocate sufficient funds for necessary upgrades, repairs, and training programs. Consequently, facilities directors and Managers may face constraints in maintaining and upgrading building systems, leading to reduced energy efficiency and compromised functionality.

4.     Complex Systems: Modern school facilities encompass a wide range of complex systems, including elevators, sprinkler systems, and sophisticated building automation systems. These systems require specialized knowledge to operate and maintain effectively. Promoting untrained personnel to facilities directors and Managers without the necessary expertise may result in inadequate system management, potential breakdowns, and compromised safety measures.

5.     Compliance with Regulations: Public-funded school districts must comply with numerous regulations and standards related to energy efficiency, indoor air quality, and safety. Facilities directors and Managers play a crucial role in ensuring compliance with these regulations. However, promoting untrained personnel without proper training and expertise may lead to unintentional violations, potentially resulting in legal consequences and reputational damage.

Conclusion: While promoting untrained personnel to facilities directors in large public-funded school districts may seem like a cost-effective solution, it can lead to several complications. These include a lack of expertise, inadequate training, limited resources, complex systems, and compliance issues. To mitigate these challenges, it is essential for school districts to invest in comprehensive training programs, allocate sufficient resources, and consider hiring professionals with the necessary qualifications and experience. By doing so, school districts can ensure efficient energy management, optimal functionality of building systems, and a safe and healthy learning environment for students and staff.


Friday, August 25, 2023


Consumer Affairs and Family Injustice /

Jules Williams.


Title: The Negative Effects of Father Absence on Children's Development and the Biased Nature of Family Court Decisions

Introduction: The role of a father in a child's life is undeniably crucial. However, in many cases, children are deprived of meaningful father involvement, particularly during their early years. Furthermore, family court decisions often lean heavily towards granting custody to mothers, resulting in an imbalanced system that undermines the importance of paternal involvement. This blog aims to shed light on the negative effects of children deprived of father involvement and the bias prevalent within family courts.

1.      Emotional and Psychological Impact: Children who grow up without a father figure often face emotional and psychological challenges. Studies have shown that a father's absence can lead to higher levels of depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem. The absence of a nurturing and supportive father can leave children feeling emotionally disconnected and can hinder their ability to form healthy relationships in the future.

2.      Educational and Cognitive Development: Father involvement has been linked to improved academic performance and cognitive development in children. Fathers tend to engage in different types of play and interaction, which stimulates cognitive skills, problem-solving abilities, and language development. Without a father's involvement, children may experience setbacks in their educational journey, leading to lower academic achievements.

3.      Social and Behavioral Issues: Children without involved fathers are more likely to exhibit behavioral problems and engage in delinquent activities. Fathers often provide a sense of discipline, structure, and guidance, which helps children develop self-control, empathy, and appropriate social behavior. The absence of a father's influence can leave children vulnerable to negative peer influences and a lack of positive role models.

4.      Impact on Father-Child Bonding: Early bonding between fathers and children is crucial for healthy attachment. It sets the foundation for emotional security and contributes to the child's overall well-being. When fathers are deprived of meaningful involvement, either due to custody biases or other factors, the bond between father and child may suffer, affecting the child's sense of identity and security.

5.      Family Court Bias: Family courts have historically exhibited a bias towards granting custody to mothers, assuming they are the primary caregivers. While this may be true in some cases, it overlooks the importance of father involvement. This bias perpetuates the notion that fathers are less capable or essential in a child's life, disregarding the potential negative consequences for both the child and the father.

6.       The need has long existed to replace the suspect notion used by family courts that seems to imply mothers are for keeping house while fathers are for bringing home money. The ratio of moms and dads in working families is about 1 to 1.

Conclusion: The negative effects of children deprived of father involvement, especially during the early years, cannot be ignored. Emotional, educational, and social repercussions can hinder a child's development and well-being. Additionally, the biased nature of family court decisions, favoring mothers for custody, further exacerbates the issue. It is crucial to recognize the importance of father involvement and work towards a fairer system that prioritizes the best interests of the child, regardless of gender. By doing so, we can create a more equitable environment that fosters healthy relationships and optimal development for children.

Sunday, March 10, 2019


I am not an Attorney. This post does not constitute Legal advice.

Well the mid term elections have come and gone. Divorces are filed at continuing paces, dockets are processed, parents show up in court and the process continues in Harris County Family Courts.

What changes are observed in the courts? well the courts seem to be better managed, cases seem to be processed in a more timely manner and the courts, to some extent seem more  respectful of litigants.

The question remains, are litigants satisfied with the level of fairness and justice provided by individual judges in the Harris County family courts or are our newly sworn judges simply accepting changes to personnel and accept the status Quo. There are families from previous years that were separated from their children who continue to go to courts with no resolution in site. There are cases that were pending that were closed with no consideration to injustices that originated from prior judges.

Unlike publicized efforts by District Attorney's office to reduce mass incarceration and acknowledge injustices involving drug use charges, the Attorney General office has not addressed disenfranchisement  of families, the punitive administration of child support, what happens to children after 18 years of age when paid to care court appointed parents no longer receive funding from the court system and the children are discarded like garbage to the spoils of society.

Or are the newly elected judges going to advocate for family law reform or simply take their chances that they will be reelected for a second term.

It is obvious that many parents are suffering the loss of their families as a result of reckless family laws. What is worse is that many family court judges are creating conditions for parents to be isolated from their children. Family courts seem to believe there has to be a winner and a loser to every case. What is lost,  is that most parents enter a divorce proceeding as hard working, caring and loving to their children. some how family court judges find ways to destroy what remains of the family by ignoring Family Codes, Rules, Statutes and even the Constitution.

These judges act more like Gods and less than judges. Here are a few examples.

One of the first things that should occur after a complaint is filed with the court, including family court is the case is entered onto a docket and a hearing is scheduled giving the Respondent the opportunity to hear and responded to charges. In family courts injunctions are frequently filed with the courts. That gives advocate and dishonest judges the first opportunity to decide the outcome of the case.Like every human being judges have personal, political and other biases.

The courts are supposed to ensure the respondent to a complaint was duly notified and prof of service returned to the court. Judges have to ensure they have jurisdiction to hear complaints and render judgement over the respondent. Too frequently, family courts ignore this basic requirement  and in many cases, a parent is thrown off their homes, they lost the companionship of their children, they are forced to pay in certain instances 51% of their income to the child support system and live with the threat of being sent to jail for visiting their home and children and  for failing to pay child support even for reasons of hardship created by the judges.

Remember many parents experienced these atrocities without knowing of hearings or notice to be in court. the judge simply begins the hearing grants a default judgement and refuses to grant a hearing for a motion to modify or set aside the default judgement. The judge simply initiate the destruction of this family and its down hill for that family from then on.

If only family court judges would adhere to existing family laws and codes, follow the required procedures for evidence impartial and fair,  many parents would cope with divorces and live manageable lives.

Rules regarding conservatory, property division, visitation and child support are ignored by family court judges who seem unable to resist  needlessly punishing  one parent, thereby destroying the children involved. Family laws were intended to manage family disputes and preserve best interest of children.
In our legal system nothing was taken to chance. Our fore fathers had witness many austerities committed against vulnerable individuals using the guise of law and  provided this country with a Constitution and the bill of rights. Our laws are what the judges say but this, ironically is a good thing.  What was not seen is the commercialization of the legal process and difficulty for average citizens to receive justice from the courts. Law makers ignore the Constitution by giving judges authority to ignore common laws and simply enact laws from the bench.
Its almost impossible to hold a judge responsible for the wrongs, or crimes committed in the name of representing laws and justice.

Our system is supposed to be based on precedence. That means the decisions compiled by judges on a repeated basis forms common opinions and establishes laws. This is important since judges are supposed to conform their opinions on decisions commonly made by other judges.

Decisions from higher courts are considered superior to that of lower courts and the US Supreme court is held as the ultimate decision maker of the land, a fact that seem to be lost with family courts.
Institution like ACLU have been fighting for preservation of our Civil Rights for many years. However, our rights are being threatened from so many areas, that our freedom and liberty is constantly being degraded. Family structures are being destroyed.

The sad reality is our rights are under attach by the very institutions charged with adjudicating justice and equity for every American.

Sunday, December 9, 2018



Not an attorney. this article is not intended to be legal advice. Consult an attorney for legal advice.

How can it be that Harris County Family Courts are so conclusively corrupt yet Law makers, Court Administrators and the office of the Attorney General does not seem to be aware or simply ignore obvious  wide spread racketeering and corruption that is degrading the reputation of the courts.

Or could it be that these officials, agencies and institutions are well aware of Harris County Court Corruption but are either burying their heads in the sand or are simply ignoring the plight of thousands of especially vulnerable Harris County residents that are unable to resist judicial assault from the hands of family courts judges.

Law makers provided judges with great latitude and immunity from prosecution for obvious injustices and crimes. They, in essence tie the hands of hard working and law abiding parents, while providing court officials with enormous levels of resources, for providing protection to court processes, judges and their staff.

        Children? who cares about children?

Can any one believe Texas cannot afford to employ separate clerks for the 1st and 14th intermediate courts of appeal serving Harris County Texas? Clerks are provided lots of administrative power and and selected by justices of the court. Having one clerk for both courts, short circuit litigants chanced of obtaining justice.

Clerk Christopher Prine is closely related to Past Judge Charley Prine. Charley Prine up to November 2018 was the most aggressive, controversial judge serving the county. Also, the family court system was the most corrupt and manipulating government institution operating in the County. Judges constructed a ring of comradeship  that  made public opposition impossible. Yet one Clerk made the determination as to which appeals court an appellant was placed in.

Can anyone contemplate court reporters in Harris County family courts charge about $500.00 per hour for recording testimony? Family Court 246 Harris County charged  $2400.00 for 10 hours of trial. Of essence most of the 10 hours were spent in court deliberations and procedures having nothing to do with testimony recording. This period also included 90 minutes daily for lunch.

These reporters make use of taxpayers court material and equipment and are paid salaries in the professional range. How can Harris County justify these fees. A reasonable conclusion could be that these fees are charged to hinder average Americans to afford justice.

Family court 309 charged  $125.00 for a 10 minute hearing where the Judge simply reset the hearing by requesting the petitioner's  personal phone number and promising to contact him  when she was finished reviewing a motion to reinstate a case that was falsely dismissed by Judge Charley Prine who lied on an official document claiming there was no activity in the case for 6 months. A simple review of the court docket will clearly show both  opponents and petitioner  were in court regarding that case 5 times in that period.

      Extend the case milk law abiding parents.

Harris County Family Courts stage judicial kidnapping of children from caring parents to parents they favor without the support of evidence or law. These judges make rulings that are so outrageous that they impose gag orders to protect their injustices and lawlessness. Harris County family courts impose default judgments without notice or process service to parties affected in many instanced, the court has knowledge that the party was not available or the court had neither certificate or prof of service, mandatory to provide jurisdiction for authenticating a case.

Harris Court family court judges refrain from providing rational for verdicts simply because they cannot provide statements of facts  and conclusions of law. These judges are intentional law breakers who protect their lawlessness using high costs that are clearly outside the  reach of especially minority  Americans.

A few hours in family court 310 would leave someone even a novice,  with no doubt that Associate Judge Conrad is either incompetent, bias, vindictive or punitive. After all,  the judge started a hearing without swearing or affirming any party, then concluded by asking the respondent whether she opposed the motion filed by the petitioner, then simply denied the  motions to restore the case to  conditions of  pre- trial since the case was dismissed along with all temporary orders associated  rulings, including salary garnishment and also to reinstate the case, since reinstatement was timely filed and accepted by the court there were hearings attended by both parties weeks prior, yet Associate judge Conrad found legal cover to deny the motions using Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure, 165 a.

I encourage every reader who is not convince of the of judge Conrad lack of understand or simple disregard for Texas rules to read this very simple and uncomplicated rule.

I met a young man in court family court 310 who has made a game of family court gimmicks. He has not only predicted the method of operations of the court but the time it takes to go through routines of the judges and attorneys. They are very predictable; extend the cases to  milk every penny from hard working parents.In his case the family court judge uses another method to pirate funds from this parent, given the judges by law makers. THE ATTORNEY AT LITEM AND AMACUS were given to judges by the to legislature  to further their reach into the pockets of  residents who have limited resources. These judges act as  judicial pirates even more  dangerous compared to pirates using riffles.

This young  man was paying his attorney fees and the cost for the attorney at litem yet there was no urgency or necessity to complete his case. The case has already lasted more than 2 years and as predicted the attorneys gabbled together and the referee, the associate judge Conrad simply reset the case and their corrupt gimmick continues. Another hearing, more wasted time,  a few more dollars pirated by the Texas family court system.

The best situation for Harris County Courts is the election results of 2018. All suspect judges lost their reelection attempts including Charley Prine and judges from courts 309 and 310 breaking the established ring of judicial corruption that existed in Harris County . This in essence brought to an end the existing web of corrupt associated with  judges operating the courts. Unfortunately, Harris County litigants will have to contend with web attachments that will continue to exist between individual judicial affiliations and appeals courts, politicians and judicial administrative personnel.

Fortunately, new judges will not have access to and established ring and be in collaboration with an army of corrupt judges that existed prior to 2018.

That is certainly good news for Harris County but particularly for the Judaical System of Harris County Texas.

      Family courts pirate money from parents.

Below is yet another case depicting corruption involving family court 310 Harris County Texas. Exhibits and further documents are available by Google court 310 Harris County.

Not endorsing comments or material associate with the following material. Material used for comparative and support of  personal experiences from family courts Harris County Texas.


Issues Presented: Unedited.

I.    Is the Infamous and Oppressive 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, d/b/a Judge Lisa Millard, d/b/a Associate Judge Conrad Moren, and all Clerks and other Sundry 310th Court Employees Committing Fraud and Racketeering While Simultaneously Contemning and Defying their Sworn Oaths of Office to “daily protect, defend, support, and uphold the Federal, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, AGAIN?”

      Associate judge assume the role of pirate

I.    Is the Infamous and Oppressive 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, d/b/a Judge Lisa Millard, d/b/a Associate Judge Conrad Moren, and all Clerks and other Sundry 310th Court Employees Committing Fraud and Racketeering While Simultaneously Contemning and Defying their Sworn Oaths of Office to “daily protect, defend, support, and uphold the Federal, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, AGAIN?”

II.  Is d/b/a Judge Millard and her Pay-to-Play Court of the 310th Trying to Do to Me What they Did to Clifford Hall when she held him in contempt of court and fraudulently imprisoned him for overpaying back child support in the amount of $3,000.00 and spending too much time with his eleven year old son who adored him because the court modified child support and visitation orders without even bothering to notify Mr. Hall, let alone giving him a fair hearing or trial after proper notice of such hearing that never occurred, thus emasculating his Fourteenth Amendment constitutional right to due process of law and to equal protections of the law?

See Exhibits I, II, and III Above, Printed from the Public Website of the Harris County Clerk, Chris Daniel, and Scanned and Uploaded onto Computer (And Mailed to Others for Safekeeping in the Event Harris County once again tries to take away my liberty, as they already kidnapped my only child and gave him to a sexually deviant pervert and a criminal (see public records of Matthew James Worrell in Harris County, Texas 2005-2006, and mugshots from Lewisville, Texas around 1998 or 1999)  who threatened to “ruin” my life, along with his family for not having an abortion in 2006 that he, without my knowledge or consent, scheduled several times over the Public Internet with his Credit Card–he even misspelled my name, of this, Judge Millard, Moren, and the 310th Court Staff had evidence on file– so he could let his wife with whom he committed adultery and stole another man’s family (also on record in the 310th–See divorce papers for Nancy Gray-Dufour, now Nancy Gray-Worrell) force my only child, my son, now age seven (7), who was kidnapped under the color of law at age 5 1/2, right before he started kindergarten.

Evidence Presented:
First, If one scrutinizes the dates printed in the bottom right-hand corner of Exhibits I, II, and III above, and contrasts those dates with the alleged “Judgments/Events” (the tab on the Harris County Clerk’s public website when one searches Cause No. 2007-05391 after clicking on the Search Records and Documents option on the left hand side of the screen), one will notice that on April 10, 2014, there was no ” Motion for Contempt of Court (Temporary Orders)” or Hearing, certainly not of which I was noticed or that was entered. 

    Judicial Piracy

 However, it is exactly such a fraudulent and backdated “Motion…” that does not appear on the “Judgments/Events” Tab of the Harris County Clerk’s website until May 14, 2014–I printed on May 16, 2014 as demonstrated in Exhibit II above.
Next, one will notice on Exhibit III, “Service/Notice” Tab under Cause No. 2007-05391, printed by myself from the public Harris County Clerk’s website in May 2014 as indicated by the date on such Exhibit (See “Precept still in possession of agency for process) that I still have yet to be properly noticed for the fake March 19, 2014 hearing that obviously never occurred, or for any other hearing for Contempt of Court and Child Support Enforcement, as falsely alleged by Attorney 

Lawrence/”Larry” Rothenberg (mailed documents to the wrong address–his client–….three times material…and a green certified return receipt request filled out with MY name …stapled to the bac of the envelopes with the correct mailing address and apparently lied and filed malicious documents perjured that falsely allege that for a year No child support paid which is a total lie and clear scheme to falsely imprison, or, “kidnap” under Texas Penal Code statute) for vexatious and harassing litigant (the sexually deviant pervert and criminal who has intention to distribute large amounts of M.D.M.A., DUI/DWI, and, since he was disrespectful to authorities and they had to take a blood sample when he was pulled over, was found with five (5) drugs/alcohol in his system, just that could be identified as it appears from substance screening reports that there were more trace unidentified substances in his system, Matthew James Worrell/a.k.a. “Matt James Worrell”–as whited out by a former Attorney Bruce Buskirk in collusion with Donna Everson, the exclusive attorney and guardian ad litem  for children of choice for Judges Millard and Moren as she is one of their highest campaign contributors 

(See Texas Tribune’s latest judicial campaign contribution figures, as reported), and notorious CPS Program Supervisor fraudster and child trafficker, Cheryl Harvick of Brazoria  County/Region 6 and her caseworker, Lesly Damian-Murray of Angleton, Texas, to make Mr. Worrell appear to have no searchable criminal record when they colluded to kidnap my only child as soon as my son’s father found out on May 04, 2012 that I was at the hospital with my son for the purpose of a sexual assault exam at the advice of my son’s physician, police officers (not the same ones who retaliated with Cheryl Harvick for making a complaint about her caseworker to the Office of Consumer Affairs), and at the command of Texas state law for which it is a harsh crime with a $2,000.00 fine not to report the allegations my son made regarding time spent at his father’s and with “The Visitor”–‘a teenager with black, spiky hair.'”

Concluding Questions:

I.     Will Judge Millard, Conrad Moren, and the 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas and my son’s fathers attorneys and privately hired process server try to backdate and/or falsify a Proof of Service Return with the Court to make it appear that I was served and summoned to court, as is required by law when one faces jail time (six months/180 days)?
II.  Will the Court then issue a fraudulent and unconstitutional Writ of Capias, or bench warrant, to have me arrested for what they might allege as “failure to appear” (even though no due process of law will have occurred)?

III.  If the Court takes aforementioned fraudulent, and, by law, criminal actions against me, will they issue a criminal, civil, or a combination of criminal and civil charge so as to strategically deny me the right to a court-appointed attorney for which I would certainly qualify even though I would face jail time/false imprisonment, a federal offense?

IV.     Is the 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas retaliating for the fact that I filed a federal lawsuit (See U.S. Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal’s Cause of Action No. 13-20605 in New Orleans for violation of mine and my only child’s First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional and civil rights), by myself, in propria persona, initially listing the 310th Court as a Defendant?

I demand fear I will be revered 

V.  Is Judge Lisa Millard emotionally unstable and guilty of treason against her duty to uphold the Supreme law and Constitution of our Land?

VI.  Would you trust Judge Lisa Millard to oversee a matter that involved your child?

VII.  Does Lisa Millard have any fiduciary interests (of conflict) with Child Advocates, Inc., Donna Everson’s employer for CPS?

VIII.  How much money did Lisa Millard earn for d/b/a Harris County, …., in 2012 and 2013 in a racketeering scheme, if any, with CPS and other BAR members and non-for-profits and Vince Ryan’s CPS court Prosecutor in the 310th Court, William Sumpter Frazier (who has the audacity and impropriety to chew on a cigar in court and use the “f” word while mocking distressed parents–somebody’s mother or father–to inappropriately bias others in court by insinuating that they are “looney birds,” by ordering perfectly healthy and normal, intelligent children into foster care, adoptions, institutions, by ordering perfectly loving and protective, healthy parents into “no contact” orders for a year before then ordering them into “SAFE” access and visitation sites that are 100% non-transparent with their donations and funding in the state of Texas–that is, currently, at least– and, finally, for enforcing child support on indigent single mothers in custody switching scams fueled by funding and kickbacks and campaign contributions from the H.H.S. in the form of (IR)”Responsible Fatherhood” state block grant Federal funding?

IX.     Did it give the “appearance of bias or prejudice” (Grounds for Immediate Recusal of a Judge and Reason for Transfer that, according to unified child court Communist social worker propaganda, will not happen) against me, a forced, self-represented litigant and mother of one very healthy, intelligent, and adorable little boy, when d/b/a Judge Lisa Millard took off her black robe (stepping out of her judicial role) on February 27, 2013 at the “Civil Building” Courthouse located at 201 Caroline, Houston, Texas  77002, came down to the cafeteria in the basement on the “break” that she called during the final trial for which I was not properly noticed and at which I was overruled on submitting all exculpatory evidence in my favor, right after my son’s father, the Petitioner and “Intervenor,” in said cause for “sole ‘managing’ ‘conservator ship’,” exited the cafeteria in the direction of the hallway from which Judge Lisa Millard came over to my table, where I had a witness, and said very menacingly and sarcastically threatened (just before she “ruled” on the pre-determined case as she signed all non-agreed, no-contract and no-contact “orders” null and void for the other parties before she allowed me to speak …but not to present any of my own or contravening evidence and reminded me repeatedly that her court was “not a ‘Constitutional Court!'”,

 “Well hello, Miss Saloom, I made a special point just to be here for you today.”  Her associate judge, Conrad Moren, DOES the dirty work as often as possible.  But then again, why wouldn’t he?  Afterall, he has Executive “Immunity” from Powers of Coast Guard (ha-ha-ha)!
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Real Jury, as Sovereign U.S. citizens of the Republics U.S. and Texas, and others, who are charged with the duty of electing such public officials to SERVE US, and I speak to the REAL Americans, What is Your Opinion?

Should you sign the Petition(s) attached to this blog to :
a.  Remove Judge Lisa Millard from the Bench
b. Sign the Petition (also attached to this blog) to Remove All Charges Against Clifford Hall, and/or
c.  Should You/We Start Our Own Petition To Bring My Only Child, Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom, home to me, UNSUPERVISED, in Addition to Calling for An Audit of the 310th Court and CPS files for the Purpose of Returning All Children Who Were Denied a Voice in Court and Improperly and Unconstitutionally “Removed,” or “Kidjacked” from the only parent(s) they had known ?

Stop family courts. Rescue our children.

d. Should Judge Lisa A. Millard and  Associate Judge Conrad Moren in the 310th Court of Harris County, Texas recused in the cause of myself and my only child?  Does there appear to be bias in Joni Saloom’s case?  Saloom has been allowed no meaningful contact with her now almost eight year-old son, her only property “child,” since he was 5 1/2–2 1/2 years ago though she was his only consistent and primary caregiver since his birth?  Would it matter knowing that Judge Millard moderated a CLE course the subject of which was how to not allow oneself to be “recused?”

e.  Should Matthew James Worrell  and his accomplices (including Kim Abernethy, CPS licensed, private”play therapist,”(therapeutic deceiver, that is),  Cheryl Harvick, Brazoria County CPS Supervisor who, with the help of complicit police officers in Pearland and Houston, Texas Officers Paul Elton and William Lilly, kidnapped my little boy, all of alleged father’s attorneys who knowingly took false affidavits an coached client to lie to officers of the court and on court record, Lesly Damian-Murray, CPS caseworker, Karen Coblentz, CPS Program Director for Brazoria County, Robin Gray/Robin Nelson (CPS Caseworker III employed at the Children’s Assessment 

Center/C.A.C., in Harris County, Debra Hatley, her supervisor, Tonya Clay (her Director), Dedra Latasha Hardaway (Brazoria County/Alvin, Texas, CPS caseworker who most likely referred Mr. Worrell to a subversive, on-the-list of cooperative counselors, the Worrell family, including Nancy Gray-Worrell and her family (who had prior knowledge and fair warning of what this man was capable of doing to me and my son as he and his mother had a documented history of kidnapping and secreting my child during my primary managing conservatorship and making numerous false reports to CPS and police to try to get me arrested and steal my child),  be prosecuted for, inter alia, malicious prosecution, perjury, repeated harassment, stalking, intention to cause severe emotional affliction and distress, extortion, fraud, forgery, obstructing justice by lying or misleading officers of the law, failure to protect a possibly vulnerable small child while his brain was still growing at a critical age, financial crimes, defrauding the federal government for abusing Title IV-D and attempting Title IV-E funding, defrauding the state of Texas’ Office of Child Support Enforcement, Committing Crimes Against the state in the form of Government Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, mismanagement of state and federal appropriated funds, negligence, intent to kidnap a child under the color of law with malice, criminal conspiracy to kidnap or secrete a child, interference with child custody, child enticement, and defamation of character with malice, falsifying government documents, cruelty to a child, and/or coaching a five year old to describe in great detail disgusting sexual acts to multiple community professionals by the people who stood to profit the most?
f. Would it make a difference to start Court-Watching (see the Movement in the 1980’s who did just that in the family courts in Harris County, Texas);

g. Wold it make a positive difference to bombard the 310th Court Clerk, Chris Daniel, Harris County Clerk’s office and private line, Vince Ryan’s Office, and Judge Ed Emmett, head of the Harris County Children’s Commissioners Court who profits and pays all of alleged guilty parties to act in the worst interest of children and failing to protect theirs and their parents’ constitutional rights, as herein charged?

h. Should we bombard Brazoria County Court Officials and Judges with Phonecalls, Court-Watching, Letters, Petitions, at City Council Meetings, etc., regarding their public (on the Internet–See Jeri Yenne, D.A.’s statements regarding CPS) refusal to obey Fifth Circuit Court and Texas state law and CPS mandated policy to respect the constitutional and civil rights of parents and children who are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, and not the other way around?
Call or e-mail me any time at : (713) 240-1727;; or write to me about your story or ideas/opinions/actions at c/o 4430 Morris Drive, Pearland, Texas  77584.
Legal Disclaimer:

(1) This post is made in good faith with the hope of deterrence of crimes  those hired to serve and protect the Real America and the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real Republic US of America.

(2) All of the content in this post is protected by the First Amendment to the Federal US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights as ratified and applied through the Fourteenth Amendment as noticed and sufficiently informed.

(3) If anyone desires a retraction or modification of content in this post based in good faith, please contact author of this blog and said author will reasonably and lawfully act.

  Demand justice from Harris County family courts

I am once again calling for a review of all 10 family courts operation in Harris county in an effort to prevent judicial crimes committed against Harris County residents. In particular review of cases involving Conservatory, Court reporters, property distribution and child support, document manipulation including documents that are supposed to be transferred from the family courts to the courts of Appeal, witness tampering and cases involving  constitutional, civil and due process violations.

The good news for residents of  Harris County Texas is the Court system has bottom when comes to integrity, it is at an all time low and can only get better, providing hope for fairer, more equitable and just legal decisions for residents of this great County.

Saturday, December 8, 2018



Image result for FREE PHOTOS CORRUPT JUDGESImage result for FREE PHOTOS CORRUPT JUDGESWhat can possibly be wrong with family courts in Harris County Texas? the obvious answer is it seem like every thing imaginable.  This court system might be the most lawless Government Institution in Texas.

Family courts are more unpredictable and feared  of any branch of government in Texas today.There the law is not what the judges say but what each individual judge claims the law is to him and what his ruling is going to be irrespective of laws, statutes constitution or president.

In July 2018 Family court judge Charley Prine dismiss a family court case that was filed in 2015. He dismissed the case irrespective of the fact that the petitioner was in court on foru occasions in the past 2 months.  In 2015 Judge Prine ordered a default judgement without process or prof of service, then threw the petitioner from his home of 14 years, turning the home to the respondent that had abandoned the house two years earlier.

Process Service.
This is done by providing a copy of the official legal documents filed with the court in a specific manner, called “service of process.” The person or entity instigating the action, the “plaintiff,” is then required to provide proof that the other party, the “defendant,” has been properly served by filing a Proof of Service form with the court. To explore this concept, consider the following proof of service definition.

Prine had neither certificate or prof of service.

Judge Prine was recused from the case by an administrative judge and the case was assigned to court 309. Well what do you know? the Judge for court 309 and 246 worked prior as judge and associate Judge and in August 2018 the Judge of 309 recused the court recognizing possible conflict of interest.
On December 5th,  Court 310 was selected  to hear motions to Return the case to conditions that existed prior to the Dismissal of the case by Judge Prine in July 2018, to reinstate the case and to end wage garnishment.

Here comes Associate Judge Conrad Mohen to adjudicate the motions and began with a sequence of comedy of unbelievable errors that had some to question if this was a rehearsal or an actual hearing. The judge called the docket for 10 am and both parties for the hearing reported present. At about 10:45 the judge called the parties for the hearing referencing the above motions. The Petitioner was called and approached the bench. The Judge could be seen reading for a prolong period while the petitioner waited.
                                               Trial court judge 246, angriest most out of control judge.

The Judge after about 5 minutes ordered the Petitioner to present his case. No swearing or affirmation and no respondent. The petitioner pointed to the judge that the respondent was in court and might be in the corridor. Judge Mohen ordered an officer to call the respondent.

The respondent entered the court room and the judge ordered the petitioner to begin testifying. Again no swear or affirmation. The petitioner summarized his motion, then the judge requested of the respondent whether she opposed the motions. The respondent answered yes then the judge shouted motions dismissed. Again the respondent was not sworn or provided affirmation.

Image result for FREE PHOTOS CORRUPT JUDGESThe question is what was the judge thinking when he ignored basic requirements of courts real or fiction to swear or have litigant affirm truthfulness prior to providing testimony.The other question is what took the judge 5 minutes to read two obvious and simple motions. If a case is dismissed all temporary orders associated with the case are essentially made moot, which is the situation in this case. Also a motion to reinstate was timely filed and accepted by the court. The judge has to respond to the motion within about 75 days. failing to respond the reinstatement should be effected as affirmed.

There was also a motion to end garnishment that the judge claimed was not on the docket and that the judge would not entertain. Well,  the judge needed only read the motions and the notice of hearing accepted by the clerk and he would have known the motion was on the docket.

Judge Mohen left me with the impression that he disliked the history of the case and decided to initiate a mockery of a trial he knew he was going to arbitrarily deny without testimony.  How  does his decision aid any party to the case?A review of the docket entry reveals no reason for the dismissal of the motions. a Judge is supposed to provide direction that resolves dispute. Can anyone conclude this semblance of a banana republic mockery help resolve any dispute.

Early demonstration against family court 246

Judge Mohen continues to degrade the reputation of Harris county family courts. The reputation of the court is in peril and embarrassing incidents like these only add to the the lack of profession integrity in the courts. These motions were not addressed by the judge with any level of integrity, there was no basis for these dismissals and it is laughable to have a respondent simply say I disagree with a motion and for judge to conclude the motion warrants dismissal. It that the acceptable standard for evidence in Harris County family courts?

Unless and until these judges are made to be responsible for their decisions the judicial  system in Harris county will continue to be in chaos with stories of corruption and judicial malpractice over shadowing the court. 

Not a lawyer. This article does not constitute legal advice. Consult an attorney for legal advice.