WHAT IS WRONG WITH 50/50 PARENTING?

We have to take the fight to Family court working with law makers to achieve the following. View links below. 1) Implement Shared Parenting legislation with EQUAL RIGHTS for both parents in divorce, unless a jury trial proves this would be harmful to the children due to a clear and proven case of an unfit parent, or BOTH parents agree otherwise.

This means a right to equal time unless otherwise agreed. 2) Change unconstitutional, predatory and abusive restraining order laws that use false allegations for advantage in divorce by taking away the children, home and income of a man whenever a woman says the word "fear" to support the growth of the multi-billion dollar, greedy and out of control Divorce and Domestic Violence Industry. 3)

Family Court Reform including full accountability for judges, who ignore due process, the U.S. Constitution, other laws and their oath of office daily. RESOURCES www.FathersUnite.org www.FathersAndFamilies.org ACFC American Coalition for Fathers and Children www.ACFC.org www.FatherhoodCoalition.org 617-SAD-DADS www.Jail4Judges.org www.fatherhoodcoalition.org And many other organizations now uniting to demand equal rights for fathers. See pages 23 and 30 for more resources. JUSTICE IS COMING! SPEAK UP! SPREAD THE WORD! E

Fathers rights endangered in family courts

Fathers have long been concerned about the questionable nature of the way orders of protection are issued in the state. Oftentimes, protection orders are used in divorce proceedings as a way to annihilate dads’ chances of obtaining custody since nearly 90% of protective orders against men result in an unfavorable court decision. It’s clear that these orders are enabling de facto discrimination by the family courts.

 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpQdW9Z32Xz3Ro3FK9o7KNcVQFSWoxCUoegKbh51nW8AO5tjif_sRufDfLjehdnNSVlzX_nHYWI4lIYtYJVvROiYCajrrlVGdyW0ViySAuKV26su0XsSMxcO225eQkEYczI07oefxnGYWr/s320/1+Sept+009.jpg Again and again,fathers are deluged with stories of dads being unfairly removed from their children’s lives by false accusations resulting in protective orders. Having an order of protection against you can even affect your criminal history and future employment prospects. Don’t stand by and watch your rights as a dad get swept away by false accusations.

 Seek out resources that understands the challenges and discrimination men face in the forum of family law and will give you the best chance of maximizing your role in your children’s lives and make it more difficult for family courts to take advantage of your rights and place your children at a disadvantage.

Fathers rights endangered in family courts

Fathers have long been concerned about the questionable nature of the way orders of protection are issued in the state. Oftentimes, protection orders are used in divorce proceedings as a way to annihilate dads’ chances of obtaining custody since nearly 90% of protective orders against men result in an unfavorable court decision. It’s clear that these orders are enabling de facto discrimination by the family courts.

 Again and again,fathers are deluged with stories of dads being unfairly removed from their children’s lives by false accusations resulting in protective orders. Having an order of protection against you can even affect your criminal history and future employment prospects.

 Don’t stand by and watch your rights as a dad get swept away by false accusations. Seek out resources that understands the challenges and discrimination men face in the forum of family law and will give you the best chance of maximizing your role in your children’s lives and make it more difficult for family courts to take advantage of your rights and place your children at a disadvantage.

FAMILY COURT 246 HARRIS COUNTY MANUFACTURES FACTS TO JUSTIFY ITS DECISIONS

Manner in which Men’s Rights Activists derail feminist arguments is alluding to instances in which women supposedly experience privilege. Often, they use the court system – and custody battles in particular – It’s true that mothers are more likely to receive custody of their children in a divorce.

Straight Marriage Struggles The institution of straight marriage perpetuates patriarchal gender roles during marriage as well as during its complement, divorce

. The same unfair assumptions that undermine the tradition of straight marriage are the ones that mire their divorces. Statistically, it appears that the family courts in the United States are biased against fathers. For example, 83% of mothers receive custody of their children in divorces. Additionally, men are awarded less support on average than mothers who are awarded support.

There is also plenty of anecdotal evidence citing situations where mothers were awarded custody in spite of fathers demonstrating interest and potential to provide and care for their children. There are organizations that demonstrate unfair court bias against men with statistics, but they ignore that the outcomes of these institutions are a manifestation of the patriarchy in our very own society.

 Even if the courts are biased, they are not biased because they dislike men. They are biased because they are reflecting the patriarchal notion that men are not meant to be caregivers and that women are not mean to breadwinners. Family court places women unfair positions. They demonize women. Oftentimes, courts make false summations and arguments that simply paint a bad picture of women and destroys any meaningful attempt by parents to make situations better for children.

Saying that all mothers – or even most mothers – who file for divorce want to keep their children from their fathers out of spite with utter disregard for the children’s best interest and relationship is unfair and unfounded. This is also an unfair manifestation of patriarchal gender expectations in marriage – and those expectations are self-imposed. The value should not be placed on fathers’ rights over children’s rights

 There are extenuating circumstances when mothers (and fathers) are not suited to be in their children’s lives. But more often than not, children benefit from having both their mother and their father in the picture.

 Although fathers have the right to be involved in their children’s lives, they also need to put the rights and needs of the children before their own.

In lieu of recent fathers’ rights movements, research has surfaced that demonstrates how the family courts hurt women as well. For example, victims of domestic violence are often characterized as unfit for parenting. So if the bias against fathers is not coming from the court system, where is it coming from? Gender Roles As I mentioned earlier, the majority of these custody agreements are decided outside of a courtroom.

 That means that the gender roles that are perpetuated in straight marriage are translating into divorce, often without the force of law. The truth is: If we are going to equalize straight divorces, we need to equalize straight marriages. Unfortunately, patriarchal gender norms hurt divorce just as much as they hurt marriage.

 Marriages based on equality, lead to better co-parenting after divorce. Family court 246 seem to shape the case and systematically frame hearings to support their forth coming decision prior to the trial. Fathers should pay special attention to defaults. Court 246 seem to work closely with well known attorneys and take advantage of default judgments to change parents positions to favor their rulings.

 Family courts give oral judgment to their preferred attorneys who throw their wish list in written form. If the father is not careful the document becomes the divorce decree and the father is stuck with it. Family court will cause you to have a bad day if you are not careful. The court can be easily used to take revenge on fathers supported by the District Attorney local office. Fathers should be encouraged to contact the District Attorney office in their State. They may not be aware of situations existing in local offices.

IN FAMILY COURT 246 ONLY THE PREFERED PARENT CHOSEN BY THE COURT POSSESSES ANY RIGHTS.

A very important motion to modify a ruling that would possibly return a father to his home and children started June 30 but was reset about 6 times. This order reasons an alleged murderer was sentenced to death prior to a trial, then the court realizes the sentence cannot be carried out without a trial. The court then attempts to insert a trial while the alleged prisoner is sitting on death row.

 Court 246 Has done all it can to show its bias and one sided justice. From taking away residence and children, to entrapping a child granting a TRO the same day accepting a motion ensuring the child would be in court to be nabbed by opposing counsel and rushed to a waiting elevator while the father searches helplessly for the child he brought into court. Evil and heartless actions have dominated a court that was approached to bring a horrible marriage to an end.

This cannot be American justice. This is mid evil justice pirate like injustice. The court has entered a number of unfavorable rulings since June 21 when a default hearing was heard by the court.

The ruling to modify could have changed the dynamics of the cases since several issues including constitutional would have surfaced. Decisions since have been all in favor of opposing party seemingly favored by the court.

When this trial ends the interest of children should be served. Family court has all but ensured that children will end in a disadvantaged condition. They have lost months of support that money cannot buy, uncertainty regarding permanent residence and interrupted medical care. They are on the way to being State dependents and they now have a remote father and part time at best mother if they have their way.

They are refusing hearings, ignoring their prior rulings and frustrating witnesses by not concluding hearings for months even when witnesses are present in court time and time again. Family court continues to show bias by ruling against a contempt charge from its own court and signed by both Judge and Attorney General. The court continues to up hold child support and other costs aimed at bringing a parent to his knees for standing up to persecution of the court and judicial lynching be the judge.

Americans can continue to hide their heads in the sand protected by exquisite air conditioned offices and allow family court injustice to ravage families reaping havoc with children's future and permanent damage to parents all over the country

. Family court has to abide by the constitution they have to provide due process and should not use the court to bully participants and create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation.

When a judge is against a party to a case nothing will get in the way of his / her bias.

At a hearing held 10th October 2016 family court judge court 246 Houston hearing a contempt case said an order granted by the court last year was not signed by the defendant and denied the motion on that basis and although the order detailed which party would file taxes for each of two children, the judge claimed that the document was between myself and the Attorney General office and so his signed order was unenforceable. Below are the signatures associated with the motion, clearly showing signatures to the court order to include the Judge, Attorney General and Defendant.

From the above signatures for the court, the attorney General office, the defendant and the judge are on the document instituting the court order. What is more interesting with the judges ruling is the plaintiff and defendant appeared prose and gave testimony under oath in the presence of a court reporter and Judge at court 246. How was the judge able to establish that I had a agreement in some back room with the AG representative and the document signed by the court is unenforceable. If this is not bias to the extreme then the meaning of bias needs to be changed. Court 246 will account for bias shown in rulings at some point. I am calling for a review of similar cases from court 246 Houston Texas.

Can family courts be using judical michief as a tool to inconvience minority males.

Family court 246 has had motions filed by a minority male from June 25th 2016, and has been scheduling hearings from 30th June to this date while finding one reason or another not to conduct the hearings. A motion to modify an order from June 25th is pending, yet the judge decision to impose child support and primary custody has been in effect. The courts flirt with a band aid has not materialize and so it continues to impose its will without due process. After all the court decision was based on a default judgment vigorously contested.

Like pirates the court seem not to act consistent with the requirements of the American constitution regarding due process. How can court 246 remove an owner of a house where he resides for 14 years ignoring due process. More over the decision was made by an Associate judge who seem to have the power to confiscate a home and give to some one who abandoned the two years ago, without any provision for expenses.

 We are not dealing as pirates here. We are dealing with an Associate judge that is using the tool of judicial mischief. This associate judge simply demands turning a key to a house to some one who has an apartment with no directive for paying bills associated with the house.

 Off course she has been in the house for almost 3 months without paying any mortgage while the court continues to delay hearings and final divorce. During that time debts continue to be accrued, family court is helping children by making possible the lost of their home.

What have children especially minorities done to deserve the wrath of family court, that makes it possible for them to loose their home of so many years. Every American should be concerned with the power given to an Associate Judges. Judges were considered Honorable for many years. Some cultures considered them Lords and refer to them as Lord ships.

 Can any one outside Judges and their affiliates tell of character that these Judges can claim give credence to associate them with terms such as Honor and Lord ship? Unlikely. Family court judges use relentless fear, bully, intimation and judicial mischief to impose unfair decisions and perpetuate lynching on minorities especially male parents. State law makers have the obligation to review actions of family courts and protect especially minorities from the wrath of these judges that results in violations of their civil and human rights a requirement of the 14th amendment.