Should court 246 not be responsible for items destroyed, discarded and removed from residence that they determined ownership for?

The problem with Family court 246 turning over a resident to someone who had abandon 2 years earlier, is that there was no accountability and responsibility. This is an occupant that had previously destroyed a house from foundation to roof including utilities. Utilities were in the thousands of dollars house was filthy and windows damaged using a hammer. The father has detailed the circumstances regarding the mother leaving the house through testimony under oath in the presence of her attorney. Testimony that was never challenged. Police was called more than a dozen times to reports of criminal mischief by the mother at the residence. That family court would after having an injunction against the mother for more than a year return her demanding the father leave the resident without securing his property is astonishing. Family court has not determined who responsible for bills utilities and other house hold expenses. Family court should not be empowered to change residence ownership without determining responsibility for liabilities associated with the residence.