Family courts have to respect US rules including the Bill of Rights detailed below.

Sec. 3.  EQUAL RIGHTS.  All free men, when they form a social compact, have equal rights, and no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive separate public emoluments, or privileges, but in consideration of public services.

 



Sec. 3a.  EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW.  Equality under the law shall not be denied or abridged because of sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.  This amendment is self-operative.  

(Added Nov. 7, 1972.)

 

There is no wiggling room for Judges in Family Court Houston to be throwing parent from their house with only the clothes on their backs, turning over their residence to another who already has a residence, revoking custody of children while the other parent has the children. One parent is clearly unable to provide support for the children and the Court promised band aid has taken almost 2 months with no resolution.

Family issues involving children have to be resolved as a matter of urgency and no court should have the authority to remove a parent from primary residence without due cause. No parent should be assigned custody or residency for children if they have to depend exclusively on State support to care for the children. If the children needs are better served by the mother that's the way the court should rule and the same is true for the father.



 But for the courts to disadvantage one parent by displacing the parent and revoking custody in order to impose financial child support on the parent that is able to house, care and feed the children having knowledge that the other parent does not have the means to support the children without depending on the State is surely a violation of that parent rights.