Could a mother acting as judge deceive a 10 year old girl to be nabbed by a mother and her henchmen?

Did a judge knowingly set a trap using court 246 to nab a child close to a waiting elevator and make a hasty retreat without hearing a scheduled motion? This is an all time low even for Family Court. Family court 246 Houston reverted to dishonest tactic to separate a 10 year old child from her father. For a mother to setup a 10 year old girl by inviting her to appear in her chambers for an interview, only to have an early hearing, then revoke a two day temporary custody order giving the child to her abandoning mother.

 What is so disappointing about that judge is that she knew exactly what she was about to do. The mother's attorney was in wait with his henchmen to grab the child and make a hasty retreat before the child knew what was happening. The child was promised by her sister and dad that the court was fair and the judge would listen to her and where she wished to. What a lie. This judge cannot be a mother and to be so deceitful to a 10 year old who had resisted the attempts of two policemen to return her to her mother days prior. 246 Family court judge use the people's court to nab a child from her father without a court hearing that she scheduled two days prior.

 The mother has refused the little girl wishes to participate in gymnastics, swimming and are classes paid for by the father. She sits at home unattended to for long periods while the mother is at work. She gets little help with home work and is at home every day from 5 am when her mother goes to work. She has no one to prepare her morning meal or to verify her preparation for school. She crosses the street alone to hitch a ride with a neighbor to attend school. This judge has to compare the disadvantage of this child to the advantage of her own and agree she has made a mortal mistake.

 The question is how many more children is this judge willing to disadvantage before realizing the havoc she and family court are perpetuating in the lives of our vulnerable children. I need everyone to view that picture. This judge almost two years ago determined the resident of the child to be with the father. A month ago she gave the child to the mother who kept the child for one week abandoning her in a house in Houston with no electricity even if she has a separate apartment.

 The father took the child until the judge ruled that the father could have the child temporarily. She then reversed her ruling when the mother requested custody in order to receive child support. Now the mother is receiving child support for herself and her aggressive night life. That a mother serving as a judge could be so deceitful is evil at its worse and her action can only be termed an abomination to the welfare of a child. This judge has lost every legitimate reason to be so considered. I hope children every where will hear the story of this evil judge and she will be remembered for her actions towards that little girl. This child will eventually get help but certainly not from FAMILY CUT 246.

Family Court Corruption Is Everywhere!

Family court 246 Houston cannot possibly think they are governed by the Constitution.

Does Court 246 Houston Texas recognize as constitutional the 24th Amendment of the United States of America? below is a paragraph clearly protecting citizens rights from the court, especially the ease with which they take property without a second thought. Intent of the Fourteenth Amendment was to Protect All Rights The main clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment are: Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ... Section. 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. The ease with which an Associate judge from court 246 can take ones property without due process is astonishing.

 It is difficult to find another country in the civilized world that gives judges power to take and turn over property while a case is in progress, without due process. Fellow Americans, today is someone else tomorrow might be you. There is no limit to the powers these family court judges have taken unto themselves and the latitude that has been given to name in the name of justice.

 It is going to take serious efforts on the part of Citizens in order to have these judges adhere to the Constitution of the United States of America. The Office of the Attorney General needs to investigate how many properties have been taken away from minority parents by Family Court 246 without due process inconsistent with requirements of the 14th amendment.

14th Ammendment? FAMILY COURT ASKS WHICH 14th AMMENDMENT?

Intent of the Fourteenth Amendment was to Protect All Rights Jon Roland 2000 Sep. 24 The main clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment are: Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ... Section. 5.

 The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. This seemingly simple language has given rise to endless controversy over its interpretation. Beginning with the Slaughterhouse Cases, the Supreme Court has decided cases involving the Fourteenth by selectively invoking only the most minimal and restrictive rights needed to decide each case, and never finding or declaring in dictum that the Fourteenth protects all rights recognized by the Constitution.

 This has led to the doctrine of selective incorporation of the Bill of rights, most of which have eventually been included in the protection, but a few of which have not. Two of the Bill of Rights that have not been "incorporated" are the Second Amendment and the Fifth. The Supreme Court has avoided taking any cases that would require it to rule on the right to keep and bear arms or assemble as an independent militia. It has, however, ruled that several provisions of the Fifth Amendment do not apply to the states. The first major case was Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884), in which it held that a state was not required to indict by grand jury.

 The issues were set forth well by Justice Harlan in Hurtado, whose dissenting opinion is correct. Unfortunately, the majority did not agree with him. The state was California, and although grand juries in California still have the power of indictment, most crimes are prosecuted upon an information, which is only a finding by a lower magistrate. On the basis of this decision, a few states have even eliminated the grand jury system altogether

. Subsequent important cases were Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908), which held a state is not required to protect the right against self-incrimination; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937), which held a state is not required to protect the right against double jeopardy; and Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947), which held that the decision of an accused not to testify may be used against him in a state criminal trial.

Children's lives may be worse than that of their parents for the first time in America

From time in history, whether migrants or Nationals, parents dream have always been that their children lives be better than their own lives and they work hard towards that goal. Children have been a driving and stabilizing force for parents for many years. Family court has and is using their judicial authority to change or affect the dreams of parents. Historically, parents decided the life direction of their children, after all they have the motive and make the investment in their children. Family court seem to have financial interest only in children at the mercy of their courts.

 Instead of the parent doing all in their power to ensure their children have a life better than theirs, the court assumes that authority. Family courts are the worse social medium that a child can depend on when it comes to shaping their future. Firstly, family courts simply choose which parent would better meet their financial support goals and with their parent of choice, they award custody of the children. If the court find the process complicated, they simply involve CPS to justify their actions. Consider judges from court 246 Houston Texas, who took a children from their father of 14 and 10 years and gave to a mother that had abandon them several times, even when she lived at the house, she left for night clubs ever day except Sundays leaving the children with the father.

 The very court after a hearing awarded the primary residence for the children with their father without the mother paying child support. No child support is not an objective of family court, so the judges had to reverse themselves, giving the children to the mother, then awarding her primary residence. Now they have no problem awarding her child support to continue financing her aggressive night life.

 How does that affect the child? well the obvious response is parents that do not have the dream or are forced to assume the role of parents by family courts will not have the desire to have their children lives better than theirs. These parents are selfish, not motivated and have very low self esteem. Yet if this is the parent profile that suites the court's objective, so be it for the child.

 Family court 246 Houston care less as to whether your children reach for the skies and reach for success. They can crawl or creep if they want with the help of the court appointed parent once the court reaps financial support from that parent, usually a minority males, all but ensuring the demise of the child, placed at a disadvantage for the remainder of their lives.

Family court meaning of equity is take all from one and give to other.

When family court 246 HOUSTON removed A father from his home of 14 years they wrote in their order that it was necessary and equitable. It was clear to the father what deceptive plans the court had in mind. The court had all along planned to give the residence to the mother along with the children.

 The court did prior allocate child support to the mother even if the mother had left the house and the father was living in the house with the children. The court made the decision and the first the father knew was when his salary was being garnished. The court eventually over turned the ruling but continued its efforts at re en stating the order.

When the court states its order was necessary they were in effect dividing a family but worth noting they were giving children to a mother that had abandon the property and children. They ignore the fact that the mother paid nothing for child support for 2 years but claimed child income credit for that period.

 That they consider this ruling to be equitable is the same as the character Shylock demanding his pound of flesh. This court order is driven by revenge for perceived challenges to prior court rulings involving child support. Court 246 had absolutely no reason to remove this father from his home then replace custody of the children only to re-impose child support.

 The judges of family court 246 are State powered bullies that will spare no effort at imposing their will and judgment to further their reasoning that minority males are only good for providing money into their child support coffers.

 If you think family court 246 cares about children welfare how is it their associate judge use trickery to virtually kidnap a 10 year old who two days resisted efforts by a police supervisor to go with her mother, had to schedule a fake hearing to grab the child next to a waiting elevator then take off to an unknown floor, transit then to hurriedly live the building.

 If family court 246 Harris County stand for fairness and equity every American should surrender to the fear that this court has made a reputation of operating. THERE IS NOTHING FAIR AND EQUITABLE REGARDING PROCESS USED BY FAMILY COURT 246Harris county Texas.

Child support fraud is the most destructive tool used by family court.