SAVAGE, VIOLENT OUT OF CONTROL FAMILY COURT JUDGES

Judges cannot be allowed to ignore rules and regulations and simply assume laws are not intended to be used against them. Family court trial judge court 246 Houston Texas has built a reputation that seeming assumes laws and legal requirements are not pertinent to him. I think the staff of 246 Family court Houston has seen the trial judge in such an acute stage of mental disorder and that he is so well known in political circles that he silently dares them to communicate his wrong doing using the court. Rule 2.15. RESPONDING TO JUDICIAL AND LAWYER MISCONDUCT

 (a) A judge having knowledge* that another judge has committed a violation of this Code that raises a substantial question regarding the judge’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge shall inform the appropriate authority.*

 (b) A judge having knowledge* that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer shall inform the appropriate authority.*

 (c) A judge who receives credible information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of this Code shall take appropriate action.

 (d) A judge who receives credible information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct shall take appropriate action.

Code Comparison The Hawai‘i Revised Code of Judicial Conduct modifies ABA Model Code Rule 2.15(C) and (D) by adding “credible.”

 COMMENT: [1]Taking action to address known misconduct is a judge’s obligation. Rules 2.15(a) and
(b) impose an obligation on the judge to report to the appropriate authority the known misconduct of another judge or a lawyer that raises a substantial question regarding the honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness of that judge or lawyer.

 Ignoring or denying known misconduct among one’s judicial colleagues or members of the legal profession undermines a judge’s responsibility to participate in efforts to ensure public respect for the justice system. This Rule limits the reporting obligation to misconduct that an independent judiciary must vigorously endeavor to prevent.

[2]A judge who does not have actual knowledge that another judge or a lawyer may have committed misconduct, but receives credible information indicating a substantial likelihood of such misconduct, is required to take appropriate action under Rules 2.15(c) and (d).

 Appropriate action may include, but is not limited to, communicating directly with the judge who may have violated this Code, communicating with a supervising judge, or reporting the suspected violation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body.

Similarly, actions to be taken in response to credible information indicating that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct may include, but are not limited to, communicating directly with the lawyer who may have committed the violation or reporting the suspected violation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body. familyactivist@gmail.com