In 2015 court 246 Houston gave two children to the control of a father since the mother openly informed the court that she had no financial resources to care for the chi!Dren. The mother had abandoned the children one year earlier but would return to the residence periodically to conduct what the police termed malicious mischief.
In 2016 the mother had further financial problems and may have had problems with maintaining her apartment. In 2015 she petitioned the court to modify a TRO that was denighed Family court 246 scheduled a divorce final for January 8th 2016 and the final was January 18th.
On January 18th she did not attend as scheduled but court 246 informed the petitioner that an attorney was employed. There began a sequence of unimaginable events that lasted June 21st when the respondent received a default judgment that gave the petitioner and her attorney the home, children and every thing on the property.
Today the home is in disarray one child has all but deserted the house. The youngest child is mostly left to care for herself and the mother continue to struggle to deal with her thousands in credit card and other debts, relying on child support to meet her debt obligations.
How did family court 246 get it so wrong? Bias. Family court rules 80% for mothers in family cases. They simply disregard the best interest of children and rule in favor of mothers regardless of their ability to meet the needs of children.
Even when the court was told by the mother that she doesn't have financial resources to maintain children, court 246 gave her two children, a house built 20 years ago, mortgage free she has paid no mortgage or other house related expenses. The house maybe heading g for foreclosure and are unsure what their present or future holds. The court knew she was responsible for car and apartment payments and that she would be responsible for the house, utilities and associated costs.
The court must have known that child support to that debt laden mother could not provide needed support for the children. Family court 246 has all but destroyed the lives of two children. The mother has denied the father access to the children and the court has not helped with motions filed with the court. Consequently the children are left to self determine their lives with the mother turning the youngest to any one she can find. Who will care for her. There is no consistency or direction associated with care for the children.
It's like family court has created the damage with the aid of a questionable attorney and a mother of opportunity. Between court 246, the attorney, judge and respondent these children lives is now complete hell. The court gave the father two days to vacate his home of 16 years and made no provision for their care. Family court has given no reason for depriving the father of his home, children and possession. The court has refused to conduct a fitness hearing and a CPS evaluation requested by the court to provide it cover clearly concluded it found no grounds to affirm the respondent should be denied his home and family.
At present the only authority keeping the father from his home and family is court 246, without due process or rule of law.
This is not an isolated case but seemingly a pattern of behavior by family court to blatantly ignore US laws, State laws, the bill of rights and American Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment