Parents joy is derived from their children achievements

#airmovement123

Parents' joy is derived from their children's achievements: 

We have to do everything in our power as parents to ensure Government doesn't lay claim to our children, compromising their future and destroying their lives forever. Family courts destroy parents' and children's present and future life forever. Family court decisions are not complicated as many seem to believe. What complicates their decision is their desire to ignore laws and codes in order to arrive at preconceived decisions that conform to their biases. Remember family court decisions are not based on facts of the case, laws, precedence, or even the Constitution. Most decisions are pre-made by judges prior to motions, hearings, or trials. These judges lock onto various matrices geared to accomplish their preconceived objectives. Essentially, it is based on how many matching funds dollars their efforts will account for.

 Family courts conclude using the Constitutionally obvious flawed doctrine of discrimination based on sex, that mothers are for keeping house and fathers are for being home money, which has resulted in family courts awarding sole managing conservatory about 88% in favor of mothers. The result has been the deprivation of necessary exposure needed to be competitive in lucrative areas of education and employment. What is lost with family courts is that their main objective is to pursue decisions that are in the best interest of the child's present and future.

I refer this court to the Texas Family Code Sec. 153.002. BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. The best interest of the child should always be the primary consideration of the court in determining the issues of conservatorship and possession of and access to the child. 

Not an attorney, so this post does not constitute legal advice.

Take advantage of opportunities for our children's education

Judicial assault on families using child support. continues.

 Judicial assault on families using child support continues in America

 

Lawmakers continue their efforts at destroying American families. While national criticism of family law and specifically child support continues nationwide, Congress is again using financial child support to continue imposing further hardships on parents and children. Congress has been responsible for unbelievable family hardships in America for many years. Congress is directly responsible for family destruction, poverty, social evils, and community demise. Congress has destroyed families and is responsible for calamities experienced in American society today.

 Make no mistake, family laws represent criminalizing law-abiding citizens, and extorting financial resources from especially minority families, ensuring minorities remain dependent on political handouts, and social programs. Where politicians don't find tax increases popular with the American population, lawmakers have no problem taxing parents more than 50% of their salaries, many of these parents struggle paycheck to paycheck.

 Child support has always been about money to States and judicial institutions; Studies have shown that child support rarely assists children, and recipients often have bad social habits and other financial circumstances. Congress always seems to ignore the harm caused by their actions, and overwhelming evidence that their involvement in critical areas of American life usually results in tremendous harm, and hardships to so many. The following statements by influential congressmen clearly show disconnect and community-related ignorance associated with their position on child support.

 These congressmen ignore national problems associated with ill-conceived child support policies including parents committing suicide, military active personnel losing their children, judges erasing children-parent relationships, and children placed in dangerous situations because of judges' careless use of family laws. Some of these effects include poverty, lowered self-esteem, and inability to compete in society are evils associated with family laws. Congress always seems to find common themes that the public can associate with, to initiate brainwashing needed to impose financial hardships on American parents, vulnerable to laws that result in them being made criminals, while providing easy money to States, making use of hidden tax increases on unsuspecting parents.

Deadbeat parents provide them the option. Can anyone believe in forcefully taking money from one parent to give to State programs, that claim to provide support to children disguised as tax parents? Having a child grow with the knowledge that their lives have been financed using food stamps, Government insurance, free school meals, and child support forcefully taken from an otherwise caring and loving parent is in the best interest of the child. An analysis of statements from three congressmen below clearly shows ignorance and out-of-touch conclusions by key members of America's congress, responsible for laws that Americans are to be governed by.

 There is no emphasis on parents spending time with their children, these children are used by family courts to punish parents disadvantaged by American family laws. If these congressmen were sincere, they would pay attention to the best interest of children, including all aspects beneficial to them, and not the financial component that they can enforce, using threats of imprisonment. In announcing the legislation Congressman Boustany said, “This president thinks he can use his pen and phone to make sweeping policy changes without legislation, but it is Congress’ role to determine child support policy, not the administration’s.

 The president’s rule could potentially let delinquent parents off the hook when we should be focused on structuring these important programs to promote strong families.” Senator Hatch said, “This legislation is necessary to reaffirm Congress’ role in legislating social welfare policy …Last year the administration issued a proposed rule that, if made final in its current form, would make it easier for non-custodial parents to evade paying child support—a move that could potentially force some American families to go on welfare. Deadbeat parents, not hardworking taxpayers, should be held accountable for their financial responsibilities.

 Our bill will prevent the administration from going forward with a unilateral approach that bypasses Congress yet again and undermines this key feature of welfare policy.” Senator Cornyn echoed those comments by saying “While Attorney General of Texas, I fought to hold deadbeat parents responsible for paying the financial support their children deserve, and I am troubled to see President Obama go around Congress to undermine a similar effort. This bill will stop the president’s unilateral action and ensure our child support laws protect innocent children and taxpayers, not absentee parents.” Speaker Ryan had one of the most sensible, reasonable, and appropriate approaches to family law reform and especially regarding child support.

 What creates the need for financial child support? The speaker of the House flirted with providing aid necessary to address the needs for supporting the child. His approach is outside the thinking of most politicians. However, the idea that parents' needs should be evaluated, and support be given to address the needs of children makes sense. For example, a parent with control of children is unable to receive financial assistance from the other parent, who can provide some level of assistance and has a job but has transportation problems.

The need is transportation, and an able parent should provide that assistance to enable continued support of the child. If housing is the problem, aid from the capable parent, found unsuitable for continuous parenting should provide child support to the abled parent to meet that need. Lawmakers should address the best interest of children while not leaving parents no option other than to end their own lives, many times taking their children in the process, CPS ravages families, and family court judges erasing family structures while destroying communities and cultures in the process. Lawmakers must be held responsible for the actions they take that result in death to parents, injury, and harm to our children, including scars some irreparable that they must live with past 18 years, some for the remainder of their lives.

 The need exists for a medium that identifies this tragedy to the lawmakers that enabled them, available for anyone to find. Such a medium will remove hiding places for politicians who find comfort in making perilous decisions than simply walking away and living lives undisturbed by the calamities they have created. 

Familyactivist@gmail.com

APRIL IS CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH. PROTEST JUDICIAL CHILD ABUSE

An area not spoken of relating to child abuse is family courts bias. Charged with providing expertise in the best interest of the child, family courts have grown a culture that seem to use children as prawns to influence punitive measures against targeted parents, courts seem not to favor parents in cases when the parent is not of their choosing.

 Children are abused in many form unnecessarily by family courts. Many situations involving separation and or divorce may have existed for months or years and resolutions to many issues would have been established. Family court would usually be seen as a means of legitimizing decisions already in place.

Then comes the City or State and special interest representatives to include judges, attorneys, social workers and other interest to initiate the family ordeal.

 Guaranteed to initiate a situation ridden with procedures that all but ensure suffering and misery to children and parents ensuring confusion and enmity between parents and all sorts of negative consequences for children.

 Family court 246 Houston Texas is staffed by two judges male and female. One would think the combination would bring about balance decisions favorable to children. Not so. Rulings from the court seem to depict clear disparities favorable to mothers at a ratio 80 to 20% against fathers. In real life, situations of research dealing with similar matrix hoping to achieve equity with such disparity would by very alarming necessitating systematic review.

Judicial child abuse is an area that should concern everyone because of the potential to affect many children for long periods with unbelievable consequences.

 What is damning is that judges seem to care less about obvious abuse to children caused by their indifference to humanity, careless disregard for laws and knowledge that law makers and citizens have accepted latitude given to them.

 Laws, statutes, higher court opinions, codes and American Constitution should be sufficient assets for judges to use without the national brain wash provided to judges to determine disputes involving families.

 Giving judges wide latitude to determine family issues, armed with lawyers, social services and the almighty attorney general office against a vulnerable minority parent unable to afford legal representation is like demanding a one leg man run up hill chased by a pack of hungry dogs with a referee given the responsibility to determine the duration of the race. Clearly no latitude is needed in this scenario.

 Cases should be decided on merit, without any unnecessary advantage to any party. The coins should be allowed to fall where they may, which is not the case with family cases.

Family court 246 Houston seem to consistently make use of its latitude, denying litigants of civil rights and due process also openly violating constitutional rights of parties not of their liking. What is even more disturbing is that both judges seemingly show the same disregard for basic humanity choosing to use both deceitful and punitive measures to punish parents wanting one thing, that to love and protect their children.

 One mother told me court 246 took the side of a felon and advocated and ruled against her in a custody case. I know of a case where a mother abandoned two children for more than two years. Approaching conclusion of the divorce case, the judges took turns getting rid of the father from his home of 15 years and returning the abandoning mother to the house and the children.

April was first declared Child Abuse Prevention Month by presidential proclamation in 1983. Since then, April has been a time to acknowledge the importance of families and communities working together to prevent child abuse.

 In Child Maltreatment 2015 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau) it was reported that in FFY 2015 in the fifty states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, an estimated 683,000 children were victims of child abuse or neglect; and 1,670 children died as a result of abuse or neglect.

 The majority of child abuse cases stemmed from situations and conditions that can be preventable when community programs and systems are engaged and supportive. A community that cares about early childhood development, parental support, and maternal mental health, for instance, is more likely to foster nurturing families and healthy children.

A body of research has identified factors known to prevent and reduce child abuse and neglect. These factors—including parental resilience, nurturing and attachment, social connections, knowledge about parenting and child development, social and emotional competence of children, and concrete supports for parents—are outlined in Preventing Child Maltreatment and Promoting Well-Being:

 A Network for Action 2017 Resource Guide, also developed by the Children's Bureau. In recognition of the collaborations needed to help prevent child abuse and neglect, the NCTSN has compiled a list of resources for advocates and policy makers, children and adolescents, educators, families and communities, and mental health and child welfare professionals.

ARE FAMILY COURT JUDGES 246 HOUSTON BIGOTS? ARE THEY HOMOPHOBICS?

Family court judge 246 Harris county Houston Texas, has gained the distinct reputation of being unjust and unfair. He is also a profound bigot and is clearly homophobic. Family court 246 is a concern to the reputation of the judicial system. Justice and fairness are building blocks for the judicial system of America.

 When trust in the system is lost, ideals, trust and confidence are all qualifications that are destroyed to the detriment of the entire judicial system. Family court trial judge 246 Houston seem to openly express his role is helping litigants of the court. Not providing equity and justice consistent with American laws. This judge imply his court is not accountable to laws, rules, statutes, codes or the constitution out side his dictate of what the laws in his court will be.

 Court 246 is a very dangerous institution that ignores due process and is bias to cultures and life styles disapprove by the court. This judge exhibits open disgust towards gays and lesbians, and don't seem to recognize the Supreme Court approval of same sex marriage.

Family court judge 246 Houston Texas ruled a father with visitation would have to receive written permission from his ex wife if he was to leave the children with any male, not immediate family or blood relative. This judge ignore males to include teachers, doctors, priests and other males that may have to provide services of one type or another to the children.

This judge has attracted demonstrations against his homophobic beliefs and bigotry and these demonstrations are likely to continue.

 The question can be asked, how is it such an intolerable, obviously very angry, unfair and bias judge exist in one of the most diversified counties in America.

 Family court 246 openly violates citizens civil rights, and constitutional rights to include, 1st, 7th and 14th amendments. Left unchecked family court 246 will maintain its reputation as being one of the most dangerous, dysfunctional institutions for children and parents in America. Familyactivist@gmail.com / techparalegal.us

THE DISGUSTING HIDDEN ROLE OF FAMILY COURTS.

 SOME EVIL DETRIMENTS TO CHILDREN, PARENTS, AND COMMUNITIES FROM POLICIES OF HOUSTON’S FAMILY COURTS

 

Unless family courts understand that their prime focus must be fairness, equality, and justice, these family courts can serve no useful purpose. For too long, family court judges have used violence, threats, and anger to demand respect and authority in the courts while being indifferent to the situations such as pain and anguish and suffering to parents and children associated with the cases they are charged to determine. let us get one thing clear, parents who are litigants in family courts are mostly law-abiding citizens providing for their families with no intention of altering their parental responsibilities.

The time comes when expertise is required, mostly to provide a framework that families encountering problems can work with. In many cases, children form part of disputes that the family court is responsible to address. It is not unusual to find situations where most problems have been mutually resolved, but the parties need legal confirmation and have no other option outside family courts. Although the best interest of children is one of the most important considerations that family court judges should keep in mind, parents' needs and responsibilities will always play a significant role in determining children's interests.

Family courts should not entertain the calculus that overburdening one parent and placing them at a disadvantage in separation or divorce, is in the best interest of anyone involved in a family dispute. Family courts can be useful only if judges are litigant blind and resort to facts, rules, codes, and laws associated with trial cases.

 Family courts assume positions vital to cases prior to trial. The role of attorneys, their affluence, relationship with judges, should have no decisive effect on a case prior to trial. Attorneys should provide legal direction to the court involving cases and should advocate legal requirements for the case.

Gone are the days when attorneys seem to care about laws, truth, or responsibility, although always charged with advocating for their clients, family court attorneys go way beyond that role. They lie, cheat, and shortcut the legal requirements of the court. Attorneys with small practices seem to be far more worthless compared to large legal companies, yet large companies are ridiculously expensive for reasons we can understand.

 Family court judges are required to manage courts by providing justice based on evidence supported by laws, codes, rules, and opinions written and available for intelligent rulings. Family court judges seem to prefer using their preferential obviously biased interpretations to determine their rulings having nothing to do with legal requirements. Laws are provided to solve this very issue.

Justice is lost in family courts. Family court in America are well known for characteristics not expected of an institution responsible for managing delicate issues of any kind and certainly not associated with families. Dealing with these court, one gets the distinct impression that law and order have no role in the courts. The court seems to operate using modules of intimidation, fear, piracy, and confusion. One gets the impression that the court is one cover-up than another.

One judge makes an obvious error the other makes certain it is covered. The court seem to have waited attorneys ready to assist the court in accomplishing results detrimental to all parties involved with cases. Family courts seem to have no problem intimidating litigants, denying parties of their choosing due process, using children to punish parents they don't support in cases, having nothing to do with evidence or laws, using the threat of one party paying the other attorney fees, or simply refusing to bring to the court, motions, orders, or processes accepted by the court.

Judges of family courts assume the role of Lords, using any means, wants, or likes to determine critical situations and decisions. Family courts determine requirements for cases by setting levels of difficulty, the more the judges despise one party the more difficult the bar of evidence, the appropriateness for applicable laws, and the more personal influence negative to the despised party is provided by the trial judges

 Family court judges have a well-established reputation as bullies and many of their staff seem to simply adhere to their positions. These are resolute workers whose careers will forever be tainted and stained by the tragedies they witnessed originating from family courts in Houston Texas. They witness parents who are frightened of the trial judge for reasons having nothing to do with their legal process but angry, loud, disrespectful, arrogant, and most of all their reputation in the community for being judge, jury and executioner in cases they adjudicate.

Like pirates, the family court uses child support as a means of destroying a parent, not of their liking, the ability to provide for their family, and certainly defending themselves against to ravages of the court. Family court judges in Houston know, that once a ruling is made against a party, not of their liking it is all but impossible to get it set aside. They are aware of the finances and resources demanded of the courts and resources received as incentives for their barbaric deeds

 These judges do not waste much time, devising means to identify their preferred litigant in a case, and then institute processes aimed at crippling a litigant using temporary orders and other gimmicks. These orders are used to pave the way for the final blow when they strip their opponents of happiness, liberty, and property. Satisfied with their accomplishments, these judicial pirates simply move to acquire the next loot.

 Family court judges should conform to laws and not latitudes given to them by their pairs. The playing field must be level with both parties to a dispute governed by legal requirements. Once a party to a dispute realizes the goal is moved to justify the ruling favoring the other party, regardless of how the decision seems to peers, that process is no longer authentic and will only serve to be divisive and contribute to anger, misgiving and disruption to families.

At what age does their learning and attention span begin?

This little angel is 8 months old and already has a liking for technology and media. Here she is occupying her travel time viewing videos.

What is amazing is the attention span of someone that young focused on an area of interest to them.

My concern is with events that interfere with or interpret these interests without concern for I'll effects.

Parent separation and divorce have to have tremendous I'll effect on the development of children.  Although parents do not possess the expertise to evaluate the effects on children when their areas of preferred interests are suddenly interrupted or destroyed, it is wildly accepted that developmental interruptions have negative effects on children, especially at an early age.

One of the most common sources of family division is family courts. The institution makes decisions that affect the lives of children in a way no other circumstance can.

Family courts are I'll be equipped to provide situations that take into account the progressive education requirements of children.